From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, willy@infradead.org, clm@fb.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2019 15:17:48 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191216041748.GL19213@dread.disaster.area> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39af5a4d-7539-5746-ac3e-e2d6bd2209e3@kernel.dk>
On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 05:57:57PM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 12/12/19 5:54 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On 12/12/19 3:34 PM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >> On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 08:29:43AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >>> This adds support for RWF_UNCACHED for file systems using iomap to
> >>> perform buffered writes. We use the generic infrastructure for this,
> >>> by tracking pages we created and calling write_drop_cached_pages()
> >>> to issue writeback and prune those pages.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
> >>> ---
> >>> fs/iomap/apply.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>> include/linux/iomap.h | 5 +++++
> >>> 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/iomap/apply.c b/fs/iomap/apply.c
> >>> index 562536da8a13..966826ad4bb9 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/iomap/apply.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/iomap/apply.c
> >>> @@ -90,5 +90,29 @@ iomap_apply(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t length, unsigned flags,
> >>> flags, &iomap);
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> + if (written && (flags & IOMAP_UNCACHED)) {
> >>> + struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
> >>> +
> >>> + end = pos + written;
> >>> + ret = filemap_write_and_wait_range(mapping, pos, end);
> >>> + if (ret)
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * No pages were created for this range, we're done
> >>> + */
> >>> + if (!(iomap.flags & IOMAP_F_PAGE_CREATE))
> >>> + goto out;
> >>> +
> >>> + /*
> >>> + * Try to invalidate cache pages for the range we just wrote.
> >>> + * We don't care if invalidation fails as the write has still
> >>> + * worked and leaving clean uptodate pages in the page cache
> >>> + * isn't a corruption vector for uncached IO.
> >>> + */
> >>> + invalidate_inode_pages2_range(mapping,
> >>> + pos >> PAGE_SHIFT, end >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> >>> + }
> >>> +out:
> >>> return written ? written : ret;
> >>> }
> >>
> >> Just a thought on further optimisation for this for XFS.
> >> IOMAP_UNCACHED is being passed into the filesystem ->iomap_begin
> >> methods by iomap_apply(). Hence the filesystems know that it is
> >> an uncached IO that is being done, and we can tailor allocation
> >> strategies to suit the fact that the data is going to be written
> >> immediately.
> >>
> >> In this case, XFS needs to treat it the same way it treats direct
> >> IO. That is, we do immediate unwritten extent allocation rather than
> >> delayed allocation. This will reduce the allocation overhead and
> >> will optimise for immediate IO locality rather than optimise for
> >> delayed allocation.
> >>
> >> This should just be a relatively simple change to
> >> xfs_file_iomap_begin() along the lines of:
> >>
> >> - if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO)) && !(flags & IOMAP_DIRECT) &&
> >> - !IS_DAX(inode) && !xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
> >> + if ((flags & (IOMAP_WRITE | IOMAP_ZERO)) &&
> >> + !(flags & (IOMAP_DIRECT | IOMAP_UNCACHED)) &&
> >> + !IS_DAX(inode) && !xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip)) {
> >> /* Reserve delalloc blocks for regular writeback. */
> >> return xfs_file_iomap_begin_delay(inode, offset, length, flags,
> >> iomap);
> >> }
> >>
> >> so that it avoids delayed allocation for uncached IO...
> >
> > That's very handy! Thanks, I'll add that to the next version. Just out
> > of curiosity, would you prefer this as a separate patch, or just bundle
> > it with the iomap buffered RWF_UNCACHED patch? I'm assuming the latter,
> > and I'll just mention it in the changelog.
>
> OK, since it's in XFS, it'd be a separate patch.
*nod*
> The code you quote seems
> to be something out-of-tree?
Ah, I quoted the code in the 5.4 release branch, not the 5.5-rc1
tree. I'd forgotten that the xfs_file_iomap_begin() got massively
refactored in the 5.5 merge and I hadn't updated my cscope trees. SO
I'm guessing you want to go looking for the
xfs_buffered_write_iomap_begin() and add another case to this
initial branch:
/* we can't use delayed allocations when using extent size hints */
if (xfs_get_extsz_hint(ip))
return xfs_direct_write_iomap_begin(inode, offset, count,
flags, iomap, srcmap);
To make the buffered write IO go down the direct IO allocation path...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-16 4:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-11 15:29 [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] fs: add read support " Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] mm: make generic_perform_write() take a struct kiocb Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] mm: make buffered writes work with RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] iomap: pass in the write_begin/write_end flags to iomap_actor Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 15:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:19 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-11 18:05 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:34 ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-13 0:54 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-13 0:57 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-16 4:17 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2019-12-17 14:31 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-18 0:49 ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-18 1:01 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 17:37 ` [PATCHSET v3 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 17:56 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 19:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 20:08 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 20:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-11 21:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2019-12-12 1:30 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 23:41 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 1:08 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 1:11 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 1:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 1:29 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 1:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 1:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12 2:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 17:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12 18:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 20:05 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12 1:41 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 1:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-12-12 1:09 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 2:03 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 2:10 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 2:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-12 2:38 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:18 ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-13 1:32 ` Chris Mason
2020-01-07 17:42 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-08 14:09 ` Chris Mason
2020-02-01 10:33 ` Andres Freund
2019-12-11 20:43 ` Matthew Wilcox
2019-12-11 20:04 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 10:44 ` Martin Steigerwald
2019-12-12 15:16 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 21:45 ` Martin Steigerwald
2019-12-12 22:15 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 22:18 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-12-12 19:01 [PATCHSET v4 " Jens Axboe
2019-12-12 19:01 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-13 2:26 ` Darrick J. Wong
2019-12-13 2:38 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 20:42 [PATCHSET v2 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 20:43 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
2019-12-11 1:14 ` Dave Chinner
2019-12-11 14:44 ` Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 16:24 [PATCHSET 0/5] Support for RWF_UNCACHED Jens Axboe
2019-12-10 16:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] iomap: support RWF_UNCACHED for buffered writes Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191216041748.GL19213@dread.disaster.area \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).