linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
Cc: "osandov@osandov.com" <osandov@osandov.com>,
	"amir73il@gmail.com" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org" 
	<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>, "hch@lst.de" <hch@lst.de>,
	"miklos@szeredi.hu" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 15:46:57 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200117154657.GK8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2730b78cf0eac685c3719909df34d8d1b0bc347.camel@hammerspace.com>

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 02:33:01PM +0000, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-01-17 at 12:49 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > It may be worth a discussion of whether linkat() could be given a
> > flag to
> > allow the destination to be replaced or if a new syscall should be
> > made for
> > this - or whether it should be disallowed entirely.
> > 
> > A set of patches has been posted by Omar Sandoval that makes this
> > possible:
> > 
> >     
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/cover.1524549513.git.osandov@fb.com/
> > 
> > though it only includes filesystem support for btrfs.
> > 
> > This could be useful for cachefiles:
> > 
> > 	
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/3326.1579019665@warthog.procyon.org.uk/
> > 
> > and overlayfs.
> > 
> 
> That seems to me like a "just go ahead and do it if you can justify it"
> kind of thing. It has plenty of precedent, and fits easily into the
> existing syscall, so why do we need a face-to-face discussion?

Unfortunately, it does *not* fit easily.  And IMO that's linux-abi fodder more
than anything else.  The problem is in coming up with sane semantics - there's
a plenty of corner cases with that one.  What to do when destination is
a dangling symlink, for example?  Or has something mounted on it (no, saying
"we'll just reject directories" is not enough).  What should happen when
destination is already a hardlink to the same object?

It's less of a horror than rename() would've been, but that's not saying
much.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-17 15:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-17 12:49 [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] Allowing linkat() to replace the destination David Howells
2020-01-17 14:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 15:46   ` Al Viro [this message]
2020-01-17 16:12     ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 16:48       ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 16:36     ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 16:59       ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 17:28         ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 18:17           ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 20:22             ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-17 22:22               ` Al Viro
2020-01-17 23:54                 ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-18  0:47                   ` Al Viro
2020-01-18  1:17                     ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-18  2:20                       ` Al Viro
2020-01-21 23:05                         ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-22  6:57                           ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-22 22:10                             ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-23  3:47                               ` Al Viro
2020-01-23  7:16                                 ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-23  7:47                                   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-24 21:25                                     ` Dave Chinner
2020-01-31  5:24                                       ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-31  5:29                                         ` hch
2020-01-31  7:00                                         ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-31 20:33                                           ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-31 21:55                                             ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-28  1:27                                   ` Omar Sandoval
2020-01-28 14:35                                 ` David Howells
2020-01-31  5:31                                   ` hch
2020-01-31  8:04                                   ` David Howells
2020-01-31  8:56                                     ` Amir Goldstein
2020-01-22  9:53                       ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:47 ` David Howells
2020-01-17 14:56   ` Trond Myklebust
2020-01-17 16:01     ` Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200117154657.GK8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=osandov@osandov.com \
    --cc=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).