From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
virtio-fs@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/19] dax: remove block device dependencies
Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 12:33:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200211173331.GC8590@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hCR9NV+2MF0iAJ5rHS2uiOgTnu=+yQRfpieDJQpQz22w@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:09:46AM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:08 PM Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, Dan,
> >
> > Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> writes:
> >
> > > I'm going to take a look at how hard it would be to develop a kpartx
> > > fallback in udev. If that can live across the driver transition then
> > > maybe this can be a non-event for end users that already have that
> > > udev update deployed.
> >
> > I just wanted to remind you that label-less dimms still exist, and are
> > still being shipped. For those devices, the only way to subdivide the
> > storage is via partitioning.
>
> True, but if kpartx + udev can make this transparent then I don't
> think users lose any functionality. They just gain a device-mapper
> dependency.
Hi Dan,
Are you planning to look into making this work?
We can easily disable partition scanning by specifying gendisk
GENHD_FL_NO_PART_SCAN flag. But what about partition additiona path,
ioctl(BLKPG_ADD_PARTITION). That does not seem to do any checks whether
block device supports in kernel partitions or not.
So kernel partitions (hence /dev/pmemXpY) objects are created anyway and
this will conflict with all the new planned udev rules.
If you block ioctl(BLKPG_ADD_PARTITION), then user space tools like
parted and fdisk started breaking when trying to create a partition
on /dev/pmeme0. IIUC, we have to allow partition table creation on
/dev/pmem0 so that later kpartx can parse it and create dm-linear
partitions.
Thanks
Vivek
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-11 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-21 17:57 [PATCH v3 00/19][RFC] virtio-fs: Enable DAX support Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 01/19] dax: remove block device dependencies Vivek Goyal
2019-08-26 11:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-27 16:38 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-28 6:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-28 17:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-28 22:53 ` Dave Chinner
2019-08-29 0:04 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-29 9:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-12-16 18:10 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-07 12:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-07 14:22 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-07 17:07 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-07 17:29 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-07 18:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-07 18:07 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-07 18:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-07 18:49 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-07 19:02 ` Darrick J. Wong
2020-01-07 19:46 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-07 23:38 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-09 11:24 ` Jan Kara
2020-01-09 20:03 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-10 12:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-14 20:31 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-14 20:39 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-14 21:28 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-14 22:23 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-15 19:56 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-15 20:17 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-15 21:08 ` Jeff Moyer
2020-01-16 18:09 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-16 18:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-16 19:09 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-16 19:23 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-02-11 17:33 ` Vivek Goyal [this message]
2020-01-15 9:03 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 02/19] dax: Pass dax_dev to dax_writeback_mapping_range() Vivek Goyal
2019-08-26 11:53 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-26 20:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-26 20:58 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-26 21:33 ` Dan Williams
2019-08-28 6:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-03 14:12 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-03 18:12 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-03 18:18 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-03 18:33 ` Vivek Goyal
2020-01-03 19:30 ` Dan Williams
2020-01-03 18:43 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-27 13:45 ` Jan Kara
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 03/19] virtio: Add get_shm_region method Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 04/19] virtio: Implement get_shm_region for PCI transport Vivek Goyal
2019-08-26 1:43 ` [Virtio-fs] " piaojun
2019-08-26 13:06 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-27 9:41 ` piaojun
2019-08-27 8:34 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-08-27 8:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-08-27 11:53 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 05/19] virtio: Implement get_shm_region for MMIO transport Vivek Goyal
2019-08-27 8:39 ` Cornelia Huck
2019-08-27 11:54 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 06/19] fuse, dax: add fuse_conn->dax_dev field Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 07/19] virtio_fs, dax: Set up virtio_fs dax_device Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 08/19] fuse: Keep a list of free dax memory ranges Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 09/19] fuse: implement FUSE_INIT map_alignment field Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 10/19] fuse: Introduce setupmapping/removemapping commands Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 11/19] fuse, dax: Implement dax read/write operations Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 19:49 ` Liu Bo
2019-08-22 12:59 ` Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 12/19] fuse, dax: add DAX mmap support Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 13/19] fuse: Define dax address space operations Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 14/19] fuse, dax: Take ->i_mmap_sem lock during dax page fault Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 15/19] fuse: Maintain a list of busy elements Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 16/19] dax: Create a range version of dax_layout_busy_page() Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 17/19] fuse: Add logic to free up a memory range Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 18/19] fuse: Release file in process context Vivek Goyal
2019-08-21 17:57 ` [PATCH 19/19] fuse: Take inode lock for dax inode truncation Vivek Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200211173331.GC8590@redhat.com \
--to=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=virtio-fs@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).