linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@linux.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>,
	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: Remove duplicated flag from VALID_OPEN_FLAGS
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 19:32:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200522173218.GB40716@rocinante> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200522171856.GU23230@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

Hello Al and Matthew!

On 20-05-22 18:18:56, Al Viro wrote:

[...]
> > I think the patch is actually right, despite the shockingly bad changelog.
> > He's removed the duplicate 'O_NDELAY' and reformatted the lines.
> 
> So he has; my apologies - the obvious false duplicate in there would be
> O_NDELAY vs. O_NONBLOCK and I'd misread the patch.
> 
> Commit message should've been along the lines of "O_NDELAY occurs twice
> in definition of VALID_OPEN_FLAGS; get rid of the duplicate", possibly
> along with "Note: O_NONBLOCK in the same expression is *not* another
> duplicate - on sparc O_NONBLOCK != O_NDELAY (done that way for ABI
> compatibility with Solaris back when sparc port began)".

Apologies.  The v2 is coming and will have proper commit message along
with subject that explains what the intended change is, etc.

Krzysztof

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-22 17:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-22 13:37 [PATCH] fs: Remove duplicated flag from VALID_OPEN_FLAGS Krzysztof Wilczynski
2020-05-22 15:47 ` Al Viro
2020-05-22 17:01   ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-22 17:18     ` Al Viro
2020-05-22 17:32       ` Krzysztof Wilczynski [this message]
2020-05-22 17:22   ` Krzysztof Wilczynski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200522173218.GB40716@rocinante \
    --to=kw@linux.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=jlayton@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).