linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Removing b_end_io
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2020 18:58:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201025185849.GJ20115@casper.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201025155652.GB5691@mit.edu>

On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 11:56:52AM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 04:44:38AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > @@ -3068,6 +3069,12 @@ static int submit_bh_wbc(int op, int op_flags, struct buffer_head *bh,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	submit_bio(bio);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int submit_bh_wbc(int op, int op_flags, struct buffer_head *bh,
> > +			 enum rw_hint write_hint, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> > +{
> > +	__bh_submit(bh, op | op_flags, write_hint, wbc, end_bio_bh_io_sync);
> >  	return 0;
> >  }
> >
> 
> I believe this will break use cases where the file system sets
> bh->b_end_io and then calls submit_bh(), which then calls
> submit_bh_wbc().  That's because with this change, calls to
> submit_bh_wbc() --- include submit_bh() --- ignores bh->b_end_io and
> results in end_bio_bh_io_sync getting used.

I think you're confused between the two end_ios.  The final argument
to bh_submit() and __bh_submit() is a bio_end_io_t.  end_bio_bh_io_sync()
calls bh->b_end_io.


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-25 18:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-25  4:44 [RFC] Removing b_end_io Matthew Wilcox
2020-10-25 15:56 ` Theodore Y. Ts'o
2020-10-25 18:58   ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2020-10-27 18:25 ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201025185849.GJ20115@casper.infradead.org \
    --to=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).