linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] fs: binfmt_em86: check return code of remove_arg_zero
       [not found] <55261f67-deb5-4089-5548-62bc091016ec@roeck-us.net>
@ 2020-12-22 21:03 ` Nick Desaulniers
  2021-01-06  2:57   ` Miguel Ojeda
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nick Desaulniers @ 2020-12-22 21:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexander Viro
  Cc: Nick Desaulniers, Masahiro Yamada, Miguel Ojeda, Guenter Roeck,
	linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel

remove_arg_zero is declared as __must_check. Looks like it can return
-EFAULT on failure.

Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
---
 fs/binfmt_em86.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/binfmt_em86.c b/fs/binfmt_em86.c
index 06b9b9fddf70..6e98fcfca66e 100644
--- a/fs/binfmt_em86.c
+++ b/fs/binfmt_em86.c
@@ -63,7 +63,8 @@ static int load_em86(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
 	 * This is done in reverse order, because of how the
 	 * user environment and arguments are stored.
 	 */
-	remove_arg_zero(bprm);
+	retval = remove_arg_zero(bprm);
+	if (retval < 0) return retval;
 	retval = copy_string_kernel(bprm->filename, bprm);
 	if (retval < 0) return retval; 
 	bprm->argc++;
-- 
2.29.2.729.g45daf8777d-goog


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] fs: binfmt_em86: check return code of remove_arg_zero
  2020-12-22 21:03 ` [PATCH] fs: binfmt_em86: check return code of remove_arg_zero Nick Desaulniers
@ 2021-01-06  2:57   ` Miguel Ojeda
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Miguel Ojeda @ 2021-01-06  2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nick Desaulniers
  Cc: Alexander Viro, Masahiro Yamada, Guenter Roeck, linux-fsdevel,
	linux-kernel, linux-alpha

On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 10:03 PM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>
> remove_arg_zero is declared as __must_check. Looks like it can return
> -EFAULT on failure.
>
> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
> Cc: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
> Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

Cc'ing Alpha list too.

Alexander, fs-devel: pinging about this... We removed
ENABLE_MUST_CHECK in 196793946264 ("Compiler Attributes: remove
CONFIG_ENABLE_MUST_CHECK"), so this should be giving a warning now
unconditionally. In 5.12 it will likely become a build error.

Nick: thanks for the patch! (I missed it in December, sorry)

Reviewed-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>

Cheers,
Miguel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-01-06  2:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <55261f67-deb5-4089-5548-62bc091016ec@roeck-us.net>
2020-12-22 21:03 ` [PATCH] fs: binfmt_em86: check return code of remove_arg_zero Nick Desaulniers
2021-01-06  2:57   ` Miguel Ojeda

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).