* [PATCH v2 08/10] kernel/sysctl-test: Remove some casts which are no-longer required
[not found] <20210513193204.816681-1-davidgow@google.com>
@ 2021-05-13 19:32 ` David Gow
2021-06-15 20:33 ` Brendan Higgins
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Gow @ 2021-05-13 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Brendan Higgins, Daniel Latypov, Shuah Khan, Luis Chamberlain,
Kees Cook, Iurii Zaikin
Cc: David Gow, kunit-dev, linux-kselftest, linux-kernel, linux-fsdevel
With some of the stricter type checking in KUnit's EXPECT macros
removed, several casts in sysctl-test are no longer required.
Remove the unnecessary casts, making the conditions clearer.
Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
kernel/sysctl-test.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sysctl-test.c b/kernel/sysctl-test.c
index ccb78509f1a8..664ded05dd7a 100644
--- a/kernel/sysctl-test.c
+++ b/kernel/sysctl-test.c
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table,
KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len,
&pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
/*
* See above.
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_null_tbl_data(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&null_data_table,
KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len,
&pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
}
/*
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&data_maxlen_unset_table,
KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer, &len,
&pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
/*
* See previous comment.
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_maxlen_unset(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&data_maxlen_unset_table,
KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer, &len,
&pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
}
/*
@@ -135,11 +135,11 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_len_is_zero(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer,
&len, &pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE, buffer,
&len, &pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
}
/*
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_api_dointvec_table_read_but_position_set(
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ, buffer,
&len, &pos));
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (size_t)0, len);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, len);
}
/*
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ,
user_buffer, &len, &pos));
- KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, (size_t)3, len);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 3, len);
buffer[len] = '\0';
/* And we read 13 back out. */
KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "13\n", buffer);
@@ -233,9 +233,9 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_read_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_READ,
user_buffer, &len, &pos));
- KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, (size_t)4, len);
+ KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ(test, 4, len);
buffer[len] = '\0';
- KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "-16\n", (char *)buffer);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_STREQ(test, "-16\n", buffer);
}
/*
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_positive(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE,
user_buffer, &len, &pos));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, (size_t)pos);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 9, *((int *)table.data));
}
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static void sysctl_test_dointvec_write_happy_single_negative(struct kunit *test)
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 0, proc_dointvec(&table, KUNIT_PROC_WRITE,
user_buffer, &len, &pos));
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, len);
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, (size_t)pos);
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, sizeof(input) - 1, pos);
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -9, *((int *)table.data));
}
--
2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread