From: Marko Rauhamaa <marko.rauhamaa@f-secure.com>
To: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fanotify: introduce event flags FAN_EXEC and FAN_EXEC_PERM
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 17:18:26 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871sbz9uml.fsf@drapion.f-secure.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180719101708.ad754qhekwoyanps@quack2.suse.cz> (Jan Kara's message of "Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:17:08 +0200")
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>:
> So fanotify is a filesystem event notification API. For filesystem,
> open and read are fundamentally different events and as such we have
> different FAN_OPEN and FAN_ACCESS events in the API. The only
> disputable events we have in the API are FAN_CLOSE_WRITE vs
> FAN_CLOSE_NOWRITE - from fs POV there's no big difference. But at
> least this is 100% reliably (unlike FMODE_EXEC) telling you whether
> the user was able to modify the file or not and it caters to one of
> the use cases this API has been created for - virus scanners, file
> caching daemons, ... - i.e., triggering specific actions based on file
> contents.
As a side note from the virus scanner point of view,
FAN_CLOSE_WRITE_PERM would be really useful because it would prevent the
hit-and-run corruption of a file. As it stands, fanotify communicates
the pid of the culprit but the process is long gone by the time you get
to analyze it...
Marko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-19 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-16 8:50 [PATCH] fanotify: introduce event flags FAN_EXEC and FAN_EXEC_PERM Matthew Bobrowski
2018-07-16 9:53 ` Marko Rauhamaa
2018-07-16 15:26 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-16 20:29 ` Steve Grubb
2018-07-17 12:44 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-17 13:36 ` Steve Grubb
2018-07-19 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-19 12:39 ` Steve Grubb
2018-07-19 13:06 ` Steve Grubb
2018-07-18 11:17 ` Matthew Bobrowski
2018-07-19 10:17 ` Jan Kara
2018-07-19 14:18 ` Marko Rauhamaa [this message]
2018-07-19 14:59 ` Steve Grubb
2018-07-17 12:21 ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-17 12:48 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871sbz9uml.fsf@drapion.f-secure.com \
--to=marko.rauhamaa@f-secure.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).