linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Fwd: posix_acl_permission() and MAY_* flags
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2018 18:43:57 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ADCDD815-9330-4BF2-B3BB-67F7AA223098@dilger.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1254FD78-8392-4B97-A191-EDA01B719635@whamcloud.com

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1084 bytes --]

I was looking at POSIX ACL on-disk and in-memory code and it looks like
there is a subtle dependency between the on-disk format and what (IMHO)
would be considered in-memory declarations.

When a POSIX ACL is read from disk, posix_acl_from_mode() copies the file
mode (S_I[RWX][UGO]) into the e_perm fields of the ACL default entries.
Similarly, in posix_acl_equiv_mode() and posix_acl_create_masq() it uses
S_IRWXO to mask the e_perm flags.

However, later on in posix_acl_permission() it directly uses the "want"
flag contains MAY_{READ,WRITE,EXEC} flags and compares those to e_perm of
each ACL entry.

In posix_acl_valid() it compares e_perm with ACL_{READ,WRITE,EXECUTE}.

While the MAY_[RWX] and ACL_[RWX] currently have the same value as
S_I[RWX]OTH, it isn't very clear that these flags MUST all have the same
values or POSIX ACLs will break.

This definitely doesn't seem quite right.  Are the ACL_* constants the
values to be used, with "conversion" in between the flags/modes?  Should
there be a BUILD_BUG_ON() that trips if those values ever differ?

Cheers, Andreas






[-- Attachment #2: Message signed with OpenPGP --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 873 bytes --]

       reply	other threads:[~2018-10-12  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1254FD78-8392-4B97-A191-EDA01B719635@whamcloud.com>
2018-10-12  0:43 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2018-10-12  9:09   ` posix_acl_permission() and MAY_* flags Andreas Grünbacher
2018-10-13  3:56     ` Al Viro
2018-10-13  4:08       ` Andreas Dilger
2018-10-13  4:37         ` Al Viro
2018-10-13  3:40   ` Fwd: " Al Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ADCDD815-9330-4BF2-B3BB-67F7AA223098@dilger.ca \
    --to=adilger@dilger.ca \
    --cc=agruenba@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).