linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] fs: Use slab constructor to initialize conn objects in fsnotify
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 09:24:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YT4behgV05BqU1PG1o0-FUNnRowdntem5n7bvraGVXz3Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200423104827.GD3737@quack2.suse.cz>

On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 6:48 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
>
> On Thu 23-04-20 08:24:23, Amir Goldstein wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:45 AM Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 12:40:50AM -0400, Joel Fernandes (Google) wrote:
> > > > While reading the famous slab paper [1], I noticed that the conn->lock
> > > > spinlock and conn->list hlist in fsnotify code is being initialized
> > > > during every object allocation. This seems a good fit for the
> > > > constructor within the slab to take advantage of the slab design. Move
> > > > the initializtion to that.
> > > >
> > > >        spin_lock_init(&conn->lock);
> > > >        INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&conn->list);
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/1acc/3a14da69dd240f2fbc11d00e09610263bdbd.pdf
> > > >
> > >
> > > The commit message could be better. Just to clarify, doing it this way is
> > > more efficient because the object will only have its spinlock init and hlist
> > > init happen during object construction, not object allocation.
> > >
> >
> > This change may be correct, but completely unjustified IMO.
> > conn objects are very rarely allocated, from user syscall path only.
> > I see no reason to micro optimize this.
> >
> > Perhaps there is another justification to do this, but not efficiency.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion Joel but I agree with Amir here. In principle
> using constructor is correct however it puts initialization of object in
> two places which makes the code harder to follow and the allocation of
> connector does not happen frequently enough for optimizing out these two
> stores to matter in any tangible way.

Thanks a lot Jan and Amir for your comments on the RFC patch. I am
glad I got learn about this concept and appreciate the discussion very
much.

I agree with your analysis about the lack of constructor benefit with
infrequent allocations, the other ones being: splitting object
initialization into 2 code paths and also dirtying the entire page and
the L1 cache that Matthew mentioned.

 - Joel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-23 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-23  4:40 [RFC] fs: Use slab constructor to initialize conn objects in fsnotify Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-04-23  4:45 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-04-23  5:24   ` Amir Goldstein
2020-04-23 10:48     ` Jan Kara
2020-04-23 13:24       ` Joel Fernandes [this message]
2020-04-23 11:40 ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-04-23 13:20   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-04-23 13:21     ` Joel Fernandes
2020-04-23 13:51     ` Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAEXW_YT4behgV05BqU1PG1o0-FUNnRowdntem5n7bvraGVXz3Q@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).