linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
To: jack@suse.cz
Cc: linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, rgb@redhat.com, amir73il@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:47:27 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAHC9VhQG8Fv3iu=QNec9X+wmwpR=YbqnwWUwJdc06__Nw7sAPA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180710100217.12866-7-jack@suse.cz>

On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 6:02 AM Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> wrote:
> Chunk replacement code is very similar for the cases where we grow or
> shrink chunk. Factor the code out into a common helper function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> ---
>  kernel/audit_tree.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

Ooof.  That code sucks.  Not your code Jan, rather the code you are
replacing.  Thanks for doing this.

I believe this looks right, although see my previous comment/question
about RCU/barriers/etc. that affects some of this code (inherited from
a previous patch in the patchset).

> diff --git a/kernel/audit_tree.c b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> index 6a01738d1ac2..f419fdfc25b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/audit_tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/audit_tree.c
> @@ -235,6 +235,38 @@ static struct audit_chunk *find_chunk(struct node *p)
>         return container_of(p, struct audit_chunk, owners[0]);
>  }
>
> +static void replace_chunk(struct audit_chunk *new, struct audit_chunk *old,
> +                         struct node *skip)
> +{
> +       struct audit_tree *owner;
> +       int i, j;
> +
> +       new->key = old->key;
> +       list_replace_init(&old->trees, &new->trees);
> +       list_for_each_entry(owner, &new->trees, same_root)
> +               owner->root = new;
> +       for (i = j = 0; j < old->count; i++, j++) {
> +               if (&old->owners[j] == skip) {
> +                       i--;
> +                       continue;
> +               }
> +               owner = old->owners[j].owner;
> +               new->owners[i].owner = owner;
> +               new->owners[i].index = old->owners[j].index - j + i;
> +               if (!owner) /* result of earlier fallback */
> +                       continue;
> +               get_tree(owner);
> +               list_replace_init(&old->owners[j].list, &new->owners[i].list);
> +       }
> +       /*
> +        * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
> +        * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
> +        * audit_tree_lookup().
> +        */
> +       smp_wmb();
> +       list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &new->hash);
> +}
> +
>  static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>  {
>         struct audit_chunk *chunk = find_chunk(p);
> @@ -242,7 +274,6 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>         struct audit_chunk *new = NULL;
>         struct audit_tree *owner;
>         int size = chunk->count - 1;
> -       int i, j;
>
>         fsnotify_get_mark(entry);
>
> @@ -291,38 +322,16 @@ static void untag_chunk(struct node *p)
>
>         chunk->dead = 1;
>         spin_lock(&hash_lock);
> -       new->key = chunk->key;
> -       list_replace_init(&chunk->trees, &new->trees);
>         if (owner->root == chunk) {
>                 list_del_init(&owner->same_root);
>                 owner->root = NULL;
>         }
> -
> -       for (i = j = 0; j <= size; i++, j++) {
> -               struct audit_tree *s;
> -               if (&chunk->owners[j] == p) {
> -                       list_del_init(&p->list);
> -                       i--;
> -                       continue;
> -               }
> -               s = chunk->owners[j].owner;
> -               new->owners[i].owner = s;
> -               new->owners[i].index = chunk->owners[j].index - j + i;
> -               if (!s) /* result of earlier fallback */
> -                       continue;
> -               get_tree(s);
> -               list_replace_init(&chunk->owners[j].list, &new->owners[i].list);
> -       }
> -
> -       list_for_each_entry(owner, &new->trees, same_root)
> -               owner->root = new;
> +       list_del_init(&p->list);
>         /*
> -        * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
> -        * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
> -        * audit_tree_lookup().
> +        * This has to go last when updating chunk as once replace_chunk() is
> +        * called, new RCU readers can see the new chunk.
>          */
> -       smp_wmb();
> -       list_replace_rcu(&chunk->hash, &new->hash);
> +       replace_chunk(new, chunk, p);
>         spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>         fsnotify_detach_mark(entry);
>         mutex_unlock(&entry->group->mark_mutex);
> @@ -399,7 +408,6 @@ static int create_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>  {
>         struct fsnotify_mark *old_entry, *chunk_entry;
> -       struct audit_tree *owner;
>         struct audit_chunk *chunk, *old;
>         struct node *p;
>         int n;
> @@ -464,35 +472,21 @@ static int tag_chunk(struct inode *inode, struct audit_tree *tree)
>                 fsnotify_put_mark(old_entry);
>                 return 0;
>         }
> -       chunk->key = old->key;
> -       list_replace_init(&old->trees, &chunk->trees);
> -       for (n = 0, p = chunk->owners; n < old->count; n++, p++) {
> -               struct audit_tree *s = old->owners[n].owner;
> -               p->owner = s;
> -               p->index = old->owners[n].index;
> -               if (!s) /* result of fallback in untag */
> -                       continue;
> -               get_tree(s);
> -               list_replace_init(&old->owners[n].list, &p->list);
> -       }
> +       p = &chunk->owners[chunk->count - 1];
>         p->index = (chunk->count - 1) | (1U<<31);
>         p->owner = tree;
>         get_tree(tree);
>         list_add(&p->list, &tree->chunks);
> -       list_for_each_entry(owner, &chunk->trees, same_root)
> -               owner->root = chunk;
>         old->dead = 1;
>         if (!tree->root) {
>                 tree->root = chunk;
>                 list_add(&tree->same_root, &chunk->trees);
>         }
>         /*
> -        * Make sure chunk is fully initialized before making it visible in the
> -        * hash. Pairs with a data dependency barrier in READ_ONCE() in
> -        * audit_tree_lookup().
> +        * This has to go last when updating chunk as once replace_chunk() is
> +        * called, new RCU readers can see the new chunk.
>          */
> -       smp_wmb();
> -       list_replace_rcu(&old->hash, &chunk->hash);
> +       replace_chunk(chunk, old, NULL);
>         spin_unlock(&hash_lock);
>         fsnotify_detach_mark(old_entry);
>         mutex_unlock(&audit_tree_group->mark_mutex);
> --
> 2.16.4

--
paul moore
www.paul-moore.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-07-27  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-10 10:02 [PATCH 0/10 v2] audit: Fix various races when tagging and untagging mounts Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 01/10] audit_tree: Remove mark->lock locking Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04  9:53     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 02/10] audit: Fix possible spurious -ENOSPC error Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 10:00     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 03/10] audit: Fix possible tagging failures Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 04/10] audit: Embed key into chunk Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 05/10] audit: Make hash table insertion safe against concurrent lookups Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 06/10] audit: Factor out chunk replacement code Jan Kara
2018-07-11  7:58   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  8:26     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-11  9:01       ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11  9:23         ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore [this message]
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 07/10] audit: Remove pointless check in insert_hash() Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 08/10] audit: Provide helper for dropping mark's chunk reference Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 09/10] audit: Allocate fsnotify mark independently of chunk Jan Kara
2018-07-11  8:57   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-11 10:48     ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-16 15:13       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 14:03     ` Jan Kara
2018-09-04 14:07       ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 10/10] audit: Replace chunk attached to mark instead of replacing mark Jan Kara
2018-07-11 14:17   ` Amir Goldstein
2018-07-27  4:47   ` Paul Moore
2018-09-04 14:11     ` Jan Kara
2018-07-10 10:02 ` [PATCH 11/10 TESTSUITE] audit_testsuite: Add stress test for tree watches Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAHC9VhQG8Fv3iu=QNec9X+wmwpR=YbqnwWUwJdc06__Nw7sAPA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).