Re: [PATCH] x86: Deprecate a.out support

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Alan Cox <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
	Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
	Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>,
	linux-alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Deprecate a.out support
Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 22:34:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a031d9mSOxVmCAGcrbdaCE8N3R4e2Smtxp-Z+cautTAvg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <yw1x1s3d42ia.fsf@mansr.com>

On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 8:47 PM Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> > On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:08 AM Måns Rullgård <mans@mansr.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> The latest version I have is 5.1, and that uses ECOFF.
> >
> > ECOFF _is_ a.out as far as Linux is concerned.
> >
> > So Linux basically treats ECOFF as "regular a.out with just some
> > header extensions".
> >
> > We don't have any specific support for ECOFF.
> >
> > I _think_. Again, it's been years and years.
>
> Right, which is why killing a.out entirely would have the unfortunate
> effect of also removing the OSF/1 compatibility on Alpha.
>
> If we are to support Alpha as an architecture at all, it makes sense to
> support the things people actually use it for.
>
> Now, personally I can live without it.  I just don't like to see
> features removed without due consideration.

The main historic use case I've heard of was running Netscape
Navigator on Alpha Linux, before there was an open source version.
Doing this today to connect to the open internet is probably
a bit pointless, but there may be other use cases.

Looking at the system call table in the kernel
(arch/alpha/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl), we seem to support a
specific subset that was required for a set of applications, and
not much more. Old system calls (osf_old_open, osf_execve,
osf_old_sigaction) are listed but not implemented, and the same
is true for most of the later calls (osf_fuser, osf_sigsendset,
osf_waitid, osf_signal, ...), just the ones in the middle are there.
This would also indicate that it never really worked as a
general-purpose emulation layer but was only there for a specific
set of applications.

Another data point I have is that osf1 emulation was broken
between linux-4.13 and linux-4.16 without anyone noticing, see
47669fb6b595 ("alpha: osf_sys.c: fix put_tv32 regression").

      Arnd