From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net>, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linux API <linux-api@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/13] vfs: don't parse "silent" option
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 12:44:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOssrKdGSRVSc38X1J0zCQQN+tUhiwPA4bCL0rHCZ-O8iVzzeQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30205.1561372589@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 12:36 PM David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > What I'm saying is that with a new interface the rules need not follow
> > the rules of the old interface, because at the start no one is using
> > the new interface, so no chance of breaking anything.
>
> Er. No. That's not true, since the old interface comes through the new one.
No, old interface sets SB_* directly from arg 4 of mount(2) and not
via parsing arg 5.
Thanks,
Miklos
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-19 12:30 [PATCH 01/13] vfs: verify param type in vfs_parse_sb_flag() Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 02/13] vfs: move vfs_parse_sb_flag() calls into filesystems Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 03/13] vfs: don't parse forbidden flags Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 04/13] vfs: don't parse "posixacl" option Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 05/13] vfs: don't parse "silent" option Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-20 4:40 ` Ian Kent
2019-06-24 8:25 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-24 10:36 ` David Howells
2019-06-24 10:44 ` Miklos Szeredi [this message]
2019-06-24 10:53 ` Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 06/13] vfs: new helper: vfs_parse_ro_rw() Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 07/13] proc: don't ignore options Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 08/13] sysfs: " Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 09/13] mqueue: " Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 10/13] cpuset: " Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 11/13] cgroup: " Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 12/13] fusectl: " Miklos Szeredi
2019-06-19 12:30 ` [PATCH 13/13] resctrl: " Miklos Szeredi
2019-07-01 8:45 ` [PATCH 01/13] vfs: verify param type in vfs_parse_sb_flag() Miklos Szeredi
2019-07-04 16:19 ` David Howells
2019-09-06 7:28 ` Miklos Szeredi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOssrKdGSRVSc38X1J0zCQQN+tUhiwPA4bCL0rHCZ-O8iVzzeQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mszeredi@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).