linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
	mst@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, sgarzare@redhat.com,
	parav@nvidia.com, bob.liu@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, willy@infradead.org,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, axboe@kernel.dk, bcrl@kvack.org,
	corbet@lwn.net
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-aio@kvack.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 01/11] eventfd: track eventfd_signal() recursion depth separately in different cases
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 12:24:06 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <e8a2cc15-80f5-01e0-75ec-ea6281fda0eb@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210119045920.447-2-xieyongji@bytedance.com>


On 2021/1/19 下午12:59, Xie Yongji wrote:
> Now we have a global percpu counter to limit the recursion depth
> of eventfd_signal(). This can avoid deadlock or stack overflow.
> But in stack overflow case, it should be OK to increase the
> recursion depth if needed. So we add a percpu counter in eventfd_ctx
> to limit the recursion depth for deadlock case. Then it could be
> fine to increase the global percpu counter later.


I wonder whether or not it's worth to introduce percpu for each eventfd.

How about simply check if eventfd_signal_count() is greater than 2?

Thanks


>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
> ---
>   fs/aio.c                |  3 ++-
>   fs/eventfd.c            | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>   include/linux/eventfd.h |  5 +----
>   3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index 1f32da13d39e..5d82903161f5 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -1698,7 +1698,8 @@ static int aio_poll_wake(struct wait_queue_entry *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
>   		list_del(&iocb->ki_list);
>   		iocb->ki_res.res = mangle_poll(mask);
>   		req->done = true;
> -		if (iocb->ki_eventfd && eventfd_signal_count()) {
> +		if (iocb->ki_eventfd &&
> +			eventfd_signal_count(iocb->ki_eventfd)) {
>   			iocb = NULL;
>   			INIT_WORK(&req->work, aio_poll_put_work);
>   			schedule_work(&req->work);
> diff --git a/fs/eventfd.c b/fs/eventfd.c
> index e265b6dd4f34..2df24f9bada3 100644
> --- a/fs/eventfd.c
> +++ b/fs/eventfd.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,8 @@
>   #include <linux/idr.h>
>   #include <linux/uio.h>
>   
> +#define EVENTFD_WAKE_DEPTH 0
> +
>   DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, eventfd_wake_count);
>   
>   static DEFINE_IDA(eventfd_ida);
> @@ -42,9 +44,17 @@ struct eventfd_ctx {
>   	 */
>   	__u64 count;
>   	unsigned int flags;
> +	int __percpu *wake_count;
>   	int id;
>   };
>   
> +bool eventfd_signal_count(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx)
> +{
> +	return (this_cpu_read(*ctx->wake_count) ||
> +		this_cpu_read(eventfd_wake_count) > EVENTFD_WAKE_DEPTH);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(eventfd_signal_count);
> +
>   /**
>    * eventfd_signal - Adds @n to the eventfd counter.
>    * @ctx: [in] Pointer to the eventfd context.
> @@ -71,17 +81,19 @@ __u64 eventfd_signal(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, __u64 n)
>   	 * it returns true, the eventfd_signal() call should be deferred to a
>   	 * safe context.
>   	 */
> -	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(this_cpu_read(eventfd_wake_count)))
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(eventfd_signal_count(ctx)))
>   		return 0;
>   
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctx->wqh.lock, flags);
>   	this_cpu_inc(eventfd_wake_count);
> +	this_cpu_inc(*ctx->wake_count);
>   	if (ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count < n)
>   		n = ULLONG_MAX - ctx->count;
>   	ctx->count += n;
>   	if (waitqueue_active(&ctx->wqh))
>   		wake_up_locked_poll(&ctx->wqh, EPOLLIN);
>   	this_cpu_dec(eventfd_wake_count);
> +	this_cpu_dec(*ctx->wake_count);
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctx->wqh.lock, flags);
>   
>   	return n;
> @@ -92,6 +104,7 @@ static void eventfd_free_ctx(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx)
>   {
>   	if (ctx->id >= 0)
>   		ida_simple_remove(&eventfd_ida, ctx->id);
> +	free_percpu(ctx->wake_count);
>   	kfree(ctx);
>   }
>   
> @@ -423,6 +436,11 @@ static int do_eventfd(unsigned int count, int flags)
>   
>   	kref_init(&ctx->kref);
>   	init_waitqueue_head(&ctx->wqh);
> +	ctx->wake_count = alloc_percpu(int);
> +	if (!ctx->wake_count) {
> +		kfree(ctx);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
>   	ctx->count = count;
>   	ctx->flags = flags;
>   	ctx->id = ida_simple_get(&eventfd_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> diff --git a/include/linux/eventfd.h b/include/linux/eventfd.h
> index fa0a524baed0..1a11ebbd74a9 100644
> --- a/include/linux/eventfd.h
> +++ b/include/linux/eventfd.h
> @@ -45,10 +45,7 @@ void eventfd_ctx_do_read(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx, __u64 *cnt);
>   
>   DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, eventfd_wake_count);
>   
> -static inline bool eventfd_signal_count(void)
> -{
> -	return this_cpu_read(eventfd_wake_count);
> -}
> +bool eventfd_signal_count(struct eventfd_ctx *ctx);
>   
>   #else /* CONFIG_EVENTFD */
>   


  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20  4:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-19  4:59 [RFC v3 00/11] Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace Xie Yongji
2021-01-19  4:59 ` [RFC v3 01/11] eventfd: track eventfd_signal() recursion depth separately in different cases Xie Yongji
2021-01-20  4:24   ` Jason Wang [this message]
2021-01-20  6:52     ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-27  3:37       ` Jason Wang
2021-01-27  9:11         ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-28  3:04           ` Jason Wang
2021-01-28  3:08             ` Jens Axboe
2021-01-28  5:12               ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-28  3:52             ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-28  4:31               ` Jason Wang
2021-01-28  6:08                 ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-19  4:59 ` [RFC v3 02/11] eventfd: Increase the recursion depth of eventfd_signal() Xie Yongji
2021-01-19  4:59 ` [RFC v3 03/11] vdpa: Remove the restriction that only supports virtio-net devices Xie Yongji
2021-01-20  3:46   ` Jason Wang
2021-01-20  6:46     ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-20 11:08     ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-27  3:33       ` Jason Wang
2021-01-27  8:57         ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-28  3:11           ` Jason Wang
     [not found]             ` <20210129150359.caitcskrfhqed73z@steredhat>
2021-01-30 11:33               ` Yongji Xie
2021-02-01 11:05                 ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-27  8:59   ` Stefano Garzarella
2021-01-27  9:05     ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-19  4:59 ` [RFC v3 04/11] vhost-vdpa: protect concurrent access to vhost device iotlb Xie Yongji
2021-01-20  3:44   ` Jason Wang
2021-01-20  6:44     ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-19  4:59 ` [RFC v3 05/11] vdpa: shared virtual addressing support Xie Yongji
2021-01-20  5:55   ` Jason Wang
2021-01-20  7:10     ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-27  3:43       ` Jason Wang
2021-01-19  4:59 ` [RFC v3 06/11] vhost-vdpa: Add an opaque pointer for vhost IOTLB Xie Yongji
2021-01-20  6:24   ` Jason Wang
2021-01-20  7:52     ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-27  3:51       ` Jason Wang
2021-01-27  9:27         ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-19  5:07 ` [RFC v3 07/11] vdpa: Pass the netlink attributes to ops.dev_add() Xie Yongji
2021-01-19  5:07   ` [RFC v3 08/11] vduse: Introduce VDUSE - vDPA Device in Userspace Xie Yongji
2021-01-19 14:53     ` Jonathan Corbet
2021-01-20  2:25       ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-19 17:53     ` Randy Dunlap
2021-01-20  2:42       ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-26  8:08     ` Jason Wang
2021-01-27  8:50       ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-28  4:27         ` Jason Wang
2021-01-28  6:03           ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-28  6:14             ` Jason Wang
2021-01-28  6:43               ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-26  8:19     ` Jason Wang
2021-01-27  8:59       ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-19  5:07   ` [RFC v3 09/11] vduse: Add VDUSE_GET_DEV ioctl Xie Yongji
2021-01-19  5:07   ` [RFC v3 10/11] vduse: grab the module's references until there is no vduse device Xie Yongji
2021-01-26  8:09     ` Jason Wang
2021-01-27  8:51       ` Yongji Xie
2021-01-19  5:07   ` [RFC v3 11/11] vduse: Introduce a workqueue for irq injection Xie Yongji
2021-01-26  8:17     ` Jason Wang
2021-01-27  9:00       ` Yongji Xie

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=e8a2cc15-80f5-01e0-75ec-ea6281fda0eb@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=bob.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-aio@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parav@nvidia.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).