Re: [PATCH 7/9] docs: i2c: i2c-topology: reorder sections more logically

[Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>]

On 8/8/22 21:17, luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com wrote:
> +Mux-locked caveats
> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> +
> +When using a mux-locked mux, be aware of the following restrictions:
> +
> +* If you build a topology with a mux-locked mux being the parent
> +  of a parent-locked mux, this might break the expectation from the
> +  parent-locked mux that the root adapter is locked during the
> +  transaction.
> +
> +* It is not safe to build arbitrary topologies with two (or more)
> +  mux-locked muxes that are not siblings, when there are address
> +  collisions between the devices on the child adapters of these
> +  non-sibling muxes.
> +
> +  I.e. the select-transfer-deselect transaction targeting e.g. device
> +  address 0x42 behind mux-one may be interleaved with a similar
> +  operation targeting device address 0x42 behind mux-two. The
> +  intension with such a topology would in this hypothetical example
> +  be that mux-one and mux-two should not be selected simultaneously,
> +  but mux-locked muxes do not guarantee that in all topologies.
> +

These two sentences in n. 2) can be combined into a single paragraph.
Also, did you mean s/intension/intention/?

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara