linux-i2c.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christian Eggers <ceggers@arri.de>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>
Cc: "Oleksij Rempel" <linux@rempel-privat.de>,
	"Shawn Guo" <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"David Laight" <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
	"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	"NXP Linux Team" <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] i2c: imx: Fix reset of I2SR_IAL flag
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 10:17:11 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5729679.lNAy7qQNGU@n95hx1g2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPctS2DGkQW3EhP5Tg0y39oVF0xhEcmbs=T0vHmUsMgsQw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday, 7 October 2020, 09:50:23 CEST, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I replied to your v2 with testing, so what happened with all my tested tags?

I am quite new to the kernel development process. Seems that I should 
integrate all "Tested-by" tags into following version of my patches.

In which cases shall the tested tags be kept and in which cases they become 
invalid?

Best regards
Christian




  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-07  8:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-06 16:08 [PATCH v4 0/3] i2c: imx: Fix handling of arbitration loss Christian Eggers
2020-10-06 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] i2c: imx: Fix reset of I2SR_IAL flag Christian Eggers
2020-10-06 18:46   ` Uwe Kleine-König
2020-10-07  7:50   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-10-07  8:17     ` Christian Eggers [this message]
2020-10-07  8:27       ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-10-06 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] i2c: imx: Check for I2SR_IAL after every byte Christian Eggers
2020-10-07  7:51   ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2020-10-06 16:08 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] i2c: imx: Don't generate STOP condition if arbitration has been lost Christian Eggers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5729679.lNAy7qQNGU@n95hx1g2 \
    --to=ceggers@arri.de \
    --cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=krzk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rempel-privat.de \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).