* [PATCH] ahci: remove duplicated PCI device IDs
@ 2021-09-17 10:24 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-17 11:21 ` Damien Le Moal
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2021-09-17 10:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Damien Le Moal, linux-ide, linux-kernel; +Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Intel devices 0x2822, 0x2823, 0x2826 and 0x2827 are already on the list
as Lewisburg AHCI/RAID. They use same configuration except 0x2822 which
has board_ahci_nosntf (for ICH8).
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
---
Not tested.
---
drivers/ata/ahci.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
index 186cbf90c8ea..5f257064fcd8 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
@@ -258,7 +258,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2683), board_ahci }, /* ESB2 */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x27c6), board_ahci }, /* ICH7-M DH */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2821), board_ahci }, /* ICH8 */
- { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2822), board_ahci_nosntf }, /* ICH8 */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2824), board_ahci }, /* ICH8 */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2829), board_ahci }, /* ICH8M */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x282a), board_ahci }, /* ICH8M */
@@ -316,7 +315,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1d02), board_ahci }, /* PBG AHCI */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1d04), board_ahci }, /* PBG RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1d06), board_ahci }, /* PBG RAID */
- { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2826), board_ahci }, /* PBG RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2323), board_ahci }, /* DH89xxCC AHCI */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1e02), board_ahci }, /* Panther Point AHCI */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1e03), board_ahci_mobile }, /* Panther M AHCI */
@@ -358,8 +356,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1f37), board_ahci_avn }, /* Avoton RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1f3e), board_ahci_avn }, /* Avoton RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1f3f), board_ahci_avn }, /* Avoton RAID */
- { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2823), board_ahci }, /* Wellsburg RAID */
- { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2827), board_ahci }, /* Wellsburg RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x43d4), board_ahci }, /* Rocket Lake PCH-H RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x43d5), board_ahci }, /* Rocket Lake PCH-H RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x43d6), board_ahci }, /* Rocket Lake PCH-H RAID */
@@ -395,9 +391,9 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa107), board_ahci_mobile }, /* Sunrise M RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa10f), board_ahci }, /* Sunrise Point-H RAID */
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2822), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
- { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2823), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg AHCI*/
- { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2826), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
- { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2827), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2823), board_ahci }, /* Wellsburg/Lewisburg AHCI*/
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2826), board_ahci }, /* PBG/Lewisburg RAID*/
+ { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2827), board_ahci }, /* Wellsburg/Lewisburg RAID*/
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa182), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg AHCI*/
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa186), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
{ PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa1d2), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
--
2.30.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ahci: remove duplicated PCI device IDs
2021-09-17 10:24 [PATCH] ahci: remove duplicated PCI device IDs Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2021-09-17 11:21 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-09-17 13:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2021-09-17 11:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, linux-ide, linux-kernel
On 2021/09/17 19:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Intel devices 0x2822, 0x2823, 0x2826 and 0x2827 are already on the list
> as Lewisburg AHCI/RAID. They use same configuration except 0x2822 which
> has board_ahci_nosntf (for ICH8).
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>
> ---
>
> Not tested.
I cannot test this either. I do not have this hardware. No chance of getting
this tested by someone ?
Changes for 0x2823, 0x2826 and 0x2827 seem OK, but 0x2822 is weird.
Since it is replicated, I think that the second entry was in fact never used as
the first one would be a hit before the second. So shouldn't we keep the first
entry with board_ahci_nosntf and remove the second one with board_ahci ?
> ---
> drivers/ata/ahci.c | 10 +++-------
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ata/ahci.c b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> index 186cbf90c8ea..5f257064fcd8 100644
> --- a/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ata/ahci.c
> @@ -258,7 +258,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2683), board_ahci }, /* ESB2 */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x27c6), board_ahci }, /* ICH7-M DH */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2821), board_ahci }, /* ICH8 */
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2822), board_ahci_nosntf }, /* ICH8 */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2824), board_ahci }, /* ICH8 */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2829), board_ahci }, /* ICH8M */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x282a), board_ahci }, /* ICH8M */
> @@ -316,7 +315,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1d02), board_ahci }, /* PBG AHCI */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1d04), board_ahci }, /* PBG RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1d06), board_ahci }, /* PBG RAID */
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2826), board_ahci }, /* PBG RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2323), board_ahci }, /* DH89xxCC AHCI */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1e02), board_ahci }, /* Panther Point AHCI */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1e03), board_ahci_mobile }, /* Panther M AHCI */
> @@ -358,8 +356,6 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1f37), board_ahci_avn }, /* Avoton RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1f3e), board_ahci_avn }, /* Avoton RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x1f3f), board_ahci_avn }, /* Avoton RAID */
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2823), board_ahci }, /* Wellsburg RAID */
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2827), board_ahci }, /* Wellsburg RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x43d4), board_ahci }, /* Rocket Lake PCH-H RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x43d5), board_ahci }, /* Rocket Lake PCH-H RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x43d6), board_ahci }, /* Rocket Lake PCH-H RAID */
> @@ -395,9 +391,9 @@ static const struct pci_device_id ahci_pci_tbl[] = {
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa107), board_ahci_mobile }, /* Sunrise M RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa10f), board_ahci }, /* Sunrise Point-H RAID */
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2822), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2823), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg AHCI*/
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2826), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
> - { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2827), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2823), board_ahci }, /* Wellsburg/Lewisburg AHCI*/
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2826), board_ahci }, /* PBG/Lewisburg RAID*/
> + { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0x2827), board_ahci }, /* Wellsburg/Lewisburg RAID*/
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa182), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg AHCI*/
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa186), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
> { PCI_VDEVICE(INTEL, 0xa1d2), board_ahci }, /* Lewisburg RAID*/
>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ahci: remove duplicated PCI device IDs
2021-09-17 11:21 ` Damien Le Moal
@ 2021-09-17 13:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2021-09-17 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Damien Le Moal, linux-ide, linux-kernel, Alexandra Yates, Shaohua Li
On 17/09/2021 13:21, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 2021/09/17 19:24, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> Intel devices 0x2822, 0x2823, 0x2826 and 0x2827 are already on the list
>> as Lewisburg AHCI/RAID. They use same configuration except 0x2822 which
>> has board_ahci_nosntf (for ICH8).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Not tested.
>
> I cannot test this either. I do not have this hardware. No chance of getting
> this tested by someone ?
>
> Changes for 0x2823, 0x2826 and 0x2827 seem OK, but 0x2822 is weird.
> Since it is replicated, I think that the second entry was in fact never used as
> the first one would be a hit before the second. So shouldn't we keep the first
> entry with board_ahci_nosntf and remove the second one with board_ahci ?
The second 0x2822 entry was added by Alexandra Yates
<alexandra.yates@linux.intel.com>.
However first entry was added with much bigger explanation by Shaohua Li
<shaohua.li@intel.com>, where he/she tested it.
Indeed it points to using board_ahci_nosntf.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-09-17 13:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-09-17 10:24 [PATCH] ahci: remove duplicated PCI device IDs Krzysztof Kozlowski
2021-09-17 11:21 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-09-17 13:03 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).