From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Cc: <linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: frequency: adf4350: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2020 18:58:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200916185816.7d1075f3@archlinux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200916092731.77220-1-alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:27:31 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com> wrote:
> From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
>
> As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces
> it with a local lock.
> The lock protect the state of the device from potential concurrent writes.
> The device is configured via a sequence of SPI writes, and this lock is
> meant to prevent the start of another sequence before another one has
> finished.
>
> This is part of a bigger cleanup.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CA+U=Dsoo6YABe5ODLp+eFNPGFDjk5ZeQEceGkqjxXcVEhLWubw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>
Applied
> ---
> drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c b/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c
> index 409c9c47161e..82c050a3899d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/frequency/adf4350.c
> @@ -47,6 +47,13 @@ struct adf4350_state {
> unsigned long regs[6];
> unsigned long regs_hw[6];
> unsigned long long freq_req;
> + /*
> + * Lock to protect the state of the device from potential concurrent
> + * writes. The device is configured via a sequence of SPI writes,
> + * and this lock is meant to prevent the start of another sequence
> + * before another one has finished.
> + */
> + struct mutex lock;
> /*
> * DMA (thus cache coherency maintenance) requires the
> * transfer buffers to live in their own cache lines.
> @@ -99,7 +106,7 @@ static int adf4350_reg_access(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (reg > ADF4350_REG5)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> if (readval == NULL) {
> st->regs[reg] = writeval & ~(BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2));
> ret = adf4350_sync_config(st);
> @@ -107,7 +114,7 @@ static int adf4350_reg_access(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> *readval = st->regs_hw[reg];
> ret = 0;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -254,7 +261,7 @@ static ssize_t adf4350_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> switch ((u32)private) {
> case ADF4350_FREQ:
> ret = adf4350_set_freq(st, readin);
> @@ -295,7 +302,7 @@ static ssize_t adf4350_write(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> default:
> ret = -EINVAL;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>
> return ret ? ret : len;
> }
> @@ -309,7 +316,7 @@ static ssize_t adf4350_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> unsigned long long val;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&st->lock);
> switch ((u32)private) {
> case ADF4350_FREQ:
> val = (u64)((st->r0_int * st->r1_mod) + st->r0_fract) *
> @@ -338,7 +345,7 @@ static ssize_t adf4350_read(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> ret = -EINVAL;
> val = 0;
> }
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&st->lock);
>
> return ret < 0 ? ret : sprintf(buf, "%llu\n", val);
> }
> @@ -539,6 +546,8 @@ static int adf4350_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> indio_dev->channels = &adf4350_chan;
> indio_dev->num_channels = 1;
>
> + mutex_init(&st->lock);
> +
> st->chspc = pdata->channel_spacing;
> if (clk) {
> st->clk = clk;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-16 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-26 6:42 [PATCH] iio: frequency: adf4350: Replace indio_dev->mlock with own device lock Alexandru Ardelean
2020-08-29 15:48 ` Jonathan Cameron
2020-09-16 9:27 ` [PATCH v2] " Alexandru Ardelean
2020-09-16 17:58 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200916185816.7d1075f3@archlinux \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sergiu.cuciurean@analog.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).