From: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: nick@shmanahar.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts: Add wake-up support
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2021 09:56:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMZdPi85FZvJ_jr_CR+t8NQZaLa2W4QiXirLpEX=aTeRRgAhEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YNPUzjrJaJEnR7vo@google.com>
Hi Dmitry,
On Thu, 24 Jun 2021 at 02:41, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Loic,
>
> On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 03:56:36PM +0200, Loic Poulain wrote:
> > Add capability for the touchscreen to wakeup the host on touch event.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@linaro.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> > index 05de92c..807f449 100644
> > --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> > +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/atmel_mxt_ts.c
> > @@ -3223,6 +3223,8 @@ static int mxt_probe(struct i2c_client *client, const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > return error;
> > }
> >
> > + device_set_wakeup_capable(&client->dev, true);
>
> We do not want to make the touch controller be wakeup source
> unconditionally. I2C core recognized "wakeup-source" in device tree,
> other platforms may employ different techniques setting I2C_CLIENT_WAKE
> when registering I2C devices to mark them as wakeup capable/enabled.
Contrary to device_init_wakeup(), used in some other input drivers,
device_set_wakeup_capable() does not enable the device as a wakeup
source but just sets it as wakeup capable, and it's up to the user or
distro policy to enable it as a wakeup source or not. It's a quite
common way to do, and it does not change the behavior of this driver.
The I2C_CLIENT_WAKE forces enabling wakeup source, which is maybe not
what we want by default for a touchscreen. remote-wakeup enabling is a
device configuration not a hardware property. Thoughts?
I should probably also add dev_pm_set_wake_irq() for auto-enabling
wake on suspend instead of doing it manually.
Regards,
Loic
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-24 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-23 13:56 [PATCH 1/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts: Add wake-up support Loic Poulain
2021-06-23 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts: atmel_mxt_ts: Fix event loss Loic Poulain
2021-06-24 0:48 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2021-06-24 5:57 ` Peter Hutterer
2021-06-24 8:05 ` Loic Poulain
2021-06-24 0:41 ` [PATCH 1/2] Input: atmel_mxt_ts: Add wake-up support Dmitry Torokhov
2021-06-24 7:56 ` Loic Poulain [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAMZdPi85FZvJ_jr_CR+t8NQZaLa2W4QiXirLpEX=aTeRRgAhEQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=loic.poulain@linaro.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nick@shmanahar.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).