From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
dhowells@redhat.com, matthewgarrett@google.com,
sashal@kernel.org, jamorris@linux.microsoft.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Cc: prsriva@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] KEYS: Defined an IMA hook to measure keys on key create or update
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 08:10:31 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572523831.5028.43.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191031011910.2574-2-nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 18:19 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> Asymmetric keys used for verifying file signatures or certificates
> are currently not included in the IMA measurement list.
>
> This patch defines a new IMA hook namely ima_post_key_create_or_update()
> to measure asymmetric keys.
It's not enough for the kernel to be able to compile the kernel after
applying all the patches in a patch set. After applying each patch,
the kernel should build properly, otherwise it is not bi-sect safe.
Refer to "3) Separate your changes" of
"Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
> ---
> security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 2 ++
> security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> index 997a57137351..22d0628faf56 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h
> @@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
> #include <linux/tpm.h>
> #include <linux/audit.h>
> #include <crypto/hash_info.h>
> +#include <crypto/public_key.h>
> +#include <keys/asymmetric-type.h>
>
> #include "../integrity.h"
>
> diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> index 492b8f241d39..18e1bc105be7 100644
> --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_main.c
> @@ -635,6 +635,9 @@ void process_buffer_measurement(const void *buf, int size,
> int action = 0;
> u32 secid;
>
> + if (!ima_policy_flag)
> + return;
> +
> if (func) {
> security_task_getsecid(current, &secid);
> action = ima_get_action(NULL, current_cred(), secid, 0, func,
> @@ -695,6 +698,29 @@ void ima_kexec_cmdline(const void *buf, int size)
> }
> }
>
> +/**
> + * ima_post_key_create_or_update - measure asymmetric keys
> + * @keyring: keyring to which the key is linked to
> + * @key: created or updated key
> + * @flags: key flags
> + * @create: flag indicating whether the key was created or updated
> + *
> + * Keys can only be measured, not appraised.
> + */
> +void ima_post_key_create_or_update(struct key *keyring, struct key *key,
> + unsigned long flags, bool create)
> +{
> + const struct public_key *pk;
> +
> + if (key->type != &key_type_asymmetric)
> + return;
> +
> + pk = key->payload.data[asym_crypto];
> + process_buffer_measurement(pk->key, pk->keylen,
> + keyring->description,
> + NONE, 0);
This patch should also define the new "func".
Mimi
> +}
> +
> static int __init init_ima(void)
> {
> int error;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-31 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-31 1:19 [PATCH v3 0/9] KEYS: Measure keys when they are created or updated Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] KEYS: Defined an IMA hook to measure keys on key create or update Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 9:10 ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-31 15:27 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 15:36 ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-31 12:10 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-10-31 15:08 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 15:27 ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-31 15:37 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-31 15:42 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] KEYS: Defined functions to queue and dequeue keys for measurement Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 12:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-31 15:09 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KEYS: Added KEYRING_CHECK policy for key measurement Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 12:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KEYS: Updated IMA policy functions for handling " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 12:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KEYS: Updated ima_get_action() to return keyrings if specified in the policy Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KEYS: Measure key if the IMA policy allows measurement for the given keyring Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KEYS: Queue key for measurement if IMA is not yet initialized. Measure queued keys when IMA initialization is completed Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KEYS: Added a boolean flag for IMA initialization status Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KEYS: Call the IMA hook to measure key when a new key is created or an existing key is updated Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1572523831.5028.43.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthewgarrett@google.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=prsriva@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).