From: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, matthewgarrett@google.com,
jamorris@linux.microsoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
prsriva@linux.microsoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] KEYS: Defined an IMA hook to measure keys on key create or update
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2019 11:37:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1572536253.5028.50.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191031152730.GQ1554@sasha-vm>
On Thu, 2019-10-31 at 11:27 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 08:08:48AM -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >On 10/31/19 5:10 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> >
> >>On Wed, 2019-10-30 at 18:19 -0700, Lakshmi Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >>>Asymmetric keys used for verifying file signatures or certificates
> >>>are currently not included in the IMA measurement list.
> >>>
> >>>This patch defines a new IMA hook namely ima_post_key_create_or_update()
> >>>to measure asymmetric keys.
> >>
> >>It's not enough for the kernel to be able to compile the kernel after
> >>applying all the patches in a patch set. After applying each patch,
> >>the kernel should build properly, otherwise it is not bi-sect safe.
> >> Refer to "3) Separate your changes" of
> >>"Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
> >
> >I started with kernel version 5.3 for this patch set.
> >I applied Nayna's process_buffer_measurement() patch and then built my
> >changes on top of that.
> >This patch has no other dependency as far as I know.
> >
> >Are you seeing a build break after applying this patch alone?
> >
> >(PATCH v3 1/9) KEYS: Defined an IMA hook to measure keys on key create
> >or update
>
> I couldn't even apply this patch: Nayna's series (v10) doesn't apply on
> top of 5.3 to begin with, and while it does apply on mainline, this
> first patch wouldn't apply on top.
Lakshmi, development is always on top of mainline. In this case,
please use 5.4.0-rc3 and apply Nayna's v10 patch set.
Mimi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-31 15:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-31 1:19 [PATCH v3 0/9] KEYS: Measure keys when they are created or updated Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] KEYS: Defined an IMA hook to measure keys on key create or update Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 9:10 ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-31 15:27 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 15:36 ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-31 12:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-31 15:08 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 15:27 ` Sasha Levin
2019-10-31 15:37 ` Mimi Zohar [this message]
2019-10-31 15:42 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] KEYS: Defined functions to queue and dequeue keys for measurement Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 12:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-31 15:09 ` Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KEYS: Added KEYRING_CHECK policy for key measurement Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 12:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KEYS: Updated IMA policy functions for handling " Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 12:10 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KEYS: Updated ima_get_action() to return keyrings if specified in the policy Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KEYS: Measure key if the IMA policy allows measurement for the given keyring Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KEYS: Queue key for measurement if IMA is not yet initialized. Measure queued keys when IMA initialization is completed Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KEYS: Added a boolean flag for IMA initialization status Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
2019-10-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KEYS: Call the IMA hook to measure key when a new key is created or an existing key is updated Lakshmi Ramasubramanian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1572536253.5028.50.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=jamorris@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthewgarrett@google.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=prsriva@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).