linux-integrity.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E . Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	Lakshmi Ramasubramanian <nramas@linux.microsoft.com>,
	Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when buffer hook functions have an invalid action
Date: Thu,  9 Jul 2020 01:19:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200709061911.954326-5-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200709061911.954326-1-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>

Buffer based hook functions, such as KEXEC_CMDLINE and KEY_CHECK, can
only measure. The process_buffer_measurement() function quietly ignores
all actions except measure so make this behavior clear at the time of
policy load.

The parsing of the keyrings conditional had a check to ensure that it
was only specified with measure actions but the check should be on the
hook function and not the keyrings conditional since
"appraise func=KEY_CHECK" is not a valid rule.

Fixes: b0935123a183 ("IMA: Define a new hook to measure the kexec boot command line arguments")
Fixes: 5808611cccb2 ("IMA: Add KEY_CHECK func to measure keys")
Signed-off-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com>
---

* v3
  - Add comments to ima_validate_rule() to separate/explain the types of
    validation checks (section for action checks, section for hook
    function checks, soon to be a section for combination of options
    checks, etc.)
  - Removed the "if (entry->flags & IMA_FUNC)" conditional around the
    switch statement in ima_validate_rule() which reduced the overall indention
    by a tab. This could be removed because entry->func is NONE when the
    IMA_FUNC flag is not set. We'll explicitly enforce and then leverage
    that property in a later patch when we start validating all hook
    functions in ima_validate_rule().
  - Add comment explicitly stating that all hook functions except
    KEXEC_CMDLINE and KEY_CHECK are still being validated in
    ima_parse_rule().
* v2
  - No change

 security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
index e458cd47c099..40c28f1a6a5a 100644
--- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
+++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
@@ -973,6 +973,43 @@ static void check_template_modsig(const struct ima_template_desc *template)
 #undef MSG
 }
 
+static bool ima_validate_rule(struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
+{
+	/* Ensure that the action is set */
+	if (entry->action == UNKNOWN)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * Ensure that the hook function is compatible with the other
+	 * components of the rule
+	 */
+	switch (entry->func) {
+	case NONE:
+	case FILE_CHECK:
+	case MMAP_CHECK:
+	case BPRM_CHECK:
+	case CREDS_CHECK:
+	case POST_SETATTR:
+	case MODULE_CHECK:
+	case FIRMWARE_CHECK:
+	case KEXEC_KERNEL_CHECK:
+	case KEXEC_INITRAMFS_CHECK:
+	case POLICY_CHECK:
+		/* Validation of these hook functions is in ima_parse_rule() */
+		break;
+	case KEXEC_CMDLINE:
+	case KEY_CHECK:
+		if (entry->action & ~(MEASURE | DONT_MEASURE))
+			return false;
+
+		break;
+	default:
+		return false;
+	}
+
+	return true;
+}
+
 static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 {
 	struct audit_buffer *ab;
@@ -1150,7 +1187,6 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 			keyrings_len = strlen(args[0].from) + 1;
 
 			if ((entry->keyrings) ||
-			    (entry->action != MEASURE) ||
 			    (entry->func != KEY_CHECK) ||
 			    (keyrings_len < 2)) {
 				result = -EINVAL;
@@ -1356,7 +1392,7 @@ static int ima_parse_rule(char *rule, struct ima_rule_entry *entry)
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	if (!result && (entry->action == UNKNOWN))
+	if (!result && !ima_validate_rule(entry))
 		result = -EINVAL;
 	else if (entry->action == APPRAISE)
 		temp_ima_appraise |= ima_appraise_flag(entry->func);
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-09  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-09  6:18 [PATCH v3 00/12] ima: Fix rule parsing bugs and extend KEXEC_CMDLINE rule support Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ima: Have the LSM free its audit rule Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 19:20   ` Nayna
2020-07-17 19:24     ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-19 11:02       ` Mimi Zohar
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] ima: Free the entire rule when deleting a list of rules Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ima: Free the entire rule if it fails to parse Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` Tyler Hicks [this message]
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEXEC_CMDLINE hook is combined with an invalid cond Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when the KEY_CHECK " Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 18:56   ` Nayna
2020-07-17 19:18     ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 23:39       ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ima: Fail rule parsing when appraise_flag=blacklist is unsupportable Tyler Hicks
2020-07-16 18:14   ` Mimi Zohar
2020-07-16 18:20     ` Tyler Hicks
     [not found]   ` <76d2b27b-3b59-1852-046a-b1718c62b167@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2020-07-17 18:11     ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-20 17:02       ` Nayna
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ima: Shallow copy the args_p member of ima_rule_entry.lsm elements Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17 15:35   ` Konsta Karsisto
2020-07-17 16:51     ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ima: Use correct type for " Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ima: Move comprehensive rule validation checks out of the token parser Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ima: Use the common function to detect LSM conditionals in a rule Tyler Hicks
2020-07-09  6:19 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ima: Support additional conditionals in the KEXEC_CMDLINE hook function Tyler Hicks
2020-07-17  4:31 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] ima: Fix rule parsing bugs and extend KEXEC_CMDLINE rule support Mimi Zohar
2020-07-17  4:34   ` Tyler Hicks
2020-07-20 21:38 ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200709061911.954326-5-tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
    --to=tyhicks@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=prsriva02@gmail.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).