Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID

[Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>]

On Mon, 2021-02-01 at 09:35 -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 2/1/21 8:23 AM, David Howells wrote:
> > Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> >>
> >> Detect whether a key is an sm2 type of key by its OID in the parameters
> >> array rather than assuming that everything under OID_id_ecPublicKey
> >> is sm2, which is not the case.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org
> > I presume these cc's are intentionally not on the first patch or the cover (if
> > there is one)?
> 
> No, this is not intentional. I guess this is a case of wrong use of cc: 
> versus mailing lists - my bad. I posted the whole series to 
> linux-crypto, linux-integrity, keyrings and lkml.
> 
> V6 is at least visible here now:
> 
> - https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/1/31/323
> 
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-crypto-vger&m=161213604618722&w=2
> 
> - 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-integrity/20210131233301.1301787-1-stefanb@linux.ibm.com/T/#mbc9fae5facb4178f64c1145e2654258c0af8fa96
> 
> - https://marc.info/?l=linux-keyrings&m=161213608818735&w=2
> 
> 
> 
> >
> > Do you have a branch you want me to pull or did you want me to take just
> > patches 2-4?
> 
> Please take it from the mailing list. If there are requests for more 
> changes on the crypto level, I will send another series. I personally am 
> waiting for some sort of verdict on the crypto level...

The entire patch set should be upstreamed as a single patch set, after
having each of the maintainer's Ack it.  In addition, the v6 version is
missing some Reviewed-by tags.  (Stefan will re-post a v7 patch set.)

David, I don't have problem with this patch set being upstreamed via
the keys subsystem, assuming it's been tested.

thanks,

Mimi