From: prakhar srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity <linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
vgoyal@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V8 1/3] Define a new IMA hook to measure the boot command line arguments
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 10:48:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEFn8qJS7MHN5o0kRjr-0_aqy0xkpCttFEzrh_8+9qqBmK3MdA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1560453720.4805.46.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 12:22 PM Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Prakhar,
>
> Patches titles in the subject line need to be prefixed with the
> subsystem, in this case "ima: ".
>
> On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 15:15 -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote:
> > This patch adds support in ima to measure kexec cmdline args
> > during soft reboot(kexec_file_load).
>
> Based on the patch title, the word "ima" is redundant. Patch
> descriptions are suppose to be written in the third person. "This
> patch adds" is unnecessary. Please review section 3 "Describe your
> changes" in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst.
>
> >
> > - A new ima hook ima_kexec_cmdline is defined to be called by the
> > kexec code.
> > - A new function process_buffer_measurement is defined to measure
> > the buffer hash into the ima log.
> > - A new func policy KEXEC_CMDLINE is defined to control the
> > measurement.[Suggested by Mimi]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava <prsriva02@gmail.com>
>
>
> > diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > index fd9b01881d17..98e351e13557 100644
> > --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_policy.c
> > @@ -292,6 +292,13 @@ static bool ima_match_rules(struct ima_rule_entry *rule, struct inode *inode,
> > {
> > int i;
> >
> > + /* only incase of KEXEC_CMDLINE, inode is NULL */
> > + if (func == KEXEC_CMDLINE) {
> > + if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) &&
> > + (rule->func == func) && (!inode))
>
> Thank you for fixing the other formatting issues. Here's another one.
> Is checking !inode needed?
Since i am adding a new type(buffer) for measurement, and only
one (file or buffer) can be passed in, this is guarding against passing
the func as KEXEC_CMDLINE for a file.
I will remove it, since the check will still return true/false, if the
rule doesn't
exist.
and fix other formatting issues.
Thanks,
- Prakhar Srivastava
> Mimi
>
> > + return true;
> > + return false;
> > + }
> > if ((rule->flags & IMA_FUNC) &&
> > (rule->func != func && func != POST_SETATTR))
> > return false;
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-14 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-12 22:15 [PATCH V8 0/3] Add support for measuring the boot command line during kexec_file_load Prakhar Srivastava
2019-06-12 22:15 ` [PATCH V8 1/3] Define a new IMA hook to measure the boot command line arguments Prakhar Srivastava
2019-06-13 19:10 ` James Morris
2019-06-13 19:22 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-14 17:48 ` prakhar srivastava [this message]
2019-06-12 22:15 ` [PATCH V8 2/3] Define a new ima template field buf Prakhar Srivastava
2019-06-13 19:15 ` James Morris
2019-06-13 19:59 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-14 10:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-14 14:14 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-14 17:52 ` prakhar srivastava
2019-06-12 22:15 ` [PATCH V8 3/3] Call ima_kexec_cmdline to measure the cmdline args Prakhar Srivastava
2019-06-12 22:31 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-13 8:26 ` Dave Young
2019-06-13 20:07 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-13 19:16 ` James Morris
2019-06-13 20:20 ` Mimi Zohar
2019-06-13 20:48 ` [PATCH V8 0/3] Add support for measuring the boot command line during kexec_file_load Mimi Zohar
2019-06-14 17:39 ` prakhar srivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAEFn8qJS7MHN5o0kRjr-0_aqy0xkpCttFEzrh_8+9qqBmK3MdA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=prsriva02@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).