From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Cc: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
Jerome Forissier <jerome@forissier.org>,
Maxim Uvarov <maxim.uvarov@linaro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@linaro.org>,
"tee-dev @ lists . linaro . org" <tee-dev@lists.linaro.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, peterhuewe@gmx.de
Subject: Re: [Tee-dev] [PATCHv8 1/3] optee: use uuid for sysfs driver entry
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 12:25:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFA6WYMKbm7HxGf_041JPD+wkjXprB9h+2HgTh4z_Ty97udFSw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1593184281.7381.16.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 20:41, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2020-06-26 at 12:29 +0100, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:40:41AM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 at 05:01, James Bottomley
> > > <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 2020-06-25 at 19:54 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 at 20:51, James Bottomley
> > > > > <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 2020-06-24 at 16:17 +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > > > > Apologies for delay in my reply as I was busy with some
> > > > > > > other stuff.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, 19 Jun 2020 at 20:30, James Bottomley
> > > > > > > <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > > it's about consistency with what the kernel types
> > > > > > > > mean. When some checker detects your using little endian
> > > > > > > > operations on a big endian structure (like in the prink
> > > > > > > > for instance) they're going to keep emailing you about
> > > > > > > > it.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > As mentioned above, using different terminology is meant to
> > > > > > > cause more confusion than just difference in endianness
> > > > > > > which is manageable inside TEE.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > And I think it's safe to say that the kernel implements
> > > > > > > UUID in big endian format and thus uses %pUb whereas OP-TEE
> > > > > > > implements UUID in little endian format and thus uses %pUl.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > So what I think you're saying is that if we still had uuid_be
> > > > > > and uuid_le you'd use uuid_le, because that's exactly the
> > > > > > structure described in the docs. But because we renamed
> > > > > >
> > > > > > uuid_be -> uuid_t
> > > > > > uuid_le -> guid_t
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You can't use guid_t as a kernel type because it has the
> > > > > > wrong name?
> > > > >
> > > > > Isn't the rename commit description [1] pretty clear about
> > > > > which is the true UUID type from Linux point of view?
> > > >
> > > > I don't think the kernel code takes a position on eternal verity,
> > > > just on logical or arithmetic truth. We just have to deal with
> > > > both LE and BE UUIDs so we have appropriate types for them and
> > > > the LE type is now named guid_t. They're both equally correct to
> > > > use provided the use case matches the designed one. So does the
> > > > name really matter?
> > >
> > > Yes it does. I guess I have provided enough reasoning for that.
> > > Also, the rename commit itself illustrates its importance and
> > > clarifies the use case for which they are meant to be used.
> > >
> > > > If we did
> > > >
> > > > #define uuid_le_t guid_t
> > > >
> > > > would you be happy? (not that the kernel cares about karmic
> > > > emotional states either ...)
> > >
> > > It's not about me being happy but more about confusion and
> > > inconsistency it will bring.
> > >
> > > IMO, either kernel should be opinionated about UUID endianness like
> > > currently it is:
> > >
> > > uuid_t and its corresponding helpers (eg. UUID_INIT) follows BE
> > > format.
> > >
> > > or support both endianness for UUID (no common type: uuid_t) like
> > > we had earlier prior to rename commit:
> > >
> > > uuid_be_t and its corresponding helpers (eg. UUID_BE_INIT) follow
> > > BE format. uuid_le_t and its corresponding helpers (eg.
> > > UUID_LE_INIT) follow LE format.
> > >
> > > But even if we consider later case as well, I am still not sure if
> > > we can switch to uuid_le_t as it's been part of TEE core ABI
> > > (open_session) where UUID is passed in BE format (see LE to BE
> > > conversion in TEE client [1] and vice-versa in OP-TEE OS [2]) and
> > > won't be a backwards compatible change.
> > >
> > > [1] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_client/blob/master/libteec/src/
> > > tee_client_api.c#L595
> > > [2] https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/blob/master/core/arch/arm/ke
> > > rnel/ree_fs_ta.c#L92
> >
> > I'm struck that all references here are to code that does not run in
> > kernel space. Frankly on LKML I don't know if we should even *care*
> > what format UUIDs are stored in other address spaces.
> >
> > We care about is the endianness of the UUID on the interface
> > boundaries into and out of the kernel[1] and we care that we use the
> > correct kernel type to describe it.
> >
> > I understood from Jerome's post that the UUID that the kernel
> > manipulates are, in fact, big endian and that they should be called
> > uuid_t.
> >
> > Is there more going on here or is that it?
>
> As you say, a UUID to the kernel is a binary blob except for input,
> which to the kernel is INIT_UUID or INIT_GUID and output, which is
> either printk %Ub for uuid_t or %Ul for guid_t.
>
> The bit I objected to was doing a %Ul on a uuid_t because it's going to
> trip the static checkers.
This is exactly which is fixed in v9 patch-set to use %Ub on a uuid_t.
> That shows me there's a confusion in the
> code between little and big endian UUID types, but I haven't looked
> further than that.
From kernel TEE subsystem perspective, it's all big endian UUID type
which forms the ABI into and out of the kernel.
-Sumit
>
> James
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-29 21:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-04 17:58 [PATCHv8 0/3] optee: register drivers on optee bus Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-04 17:58 ` [PATCHv8 1/3] optee: use uuid for sysfs driver entry Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-16 20:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-17 6:07 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-17 6:45 ` Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-17 13:58 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-17 14:12 ` Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-17 15:16 ` [Tee-dev] " Jerome Forissier
2020-06-17 19:52 ` Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-17 20:45 ` Jerome Forissier
2020-06-18 4:59 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-18 5:12 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-18 19:18 ` James Bottomley
2020-06-19 8:12 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-19 15:00 ` James Bottomley
2020-06-24 9:50 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-06-24 10:47 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-24 15:21 ` James Bottomley
2020-06-24 15:44 ` Jerome Forissier
2020-06-25 12:51 ` Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-26 5:13 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-26 8:47 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-06-26 5:26 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-25 14:24 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-25 23:31 ` James Bottomley
2020-06-26 5:10 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-26 7:26 ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-26 11:29 ` Daniel Thompson
2020-06-26 15:11 ` James Bottomley
2020-06-29 6:55 ` Sumit Garg [this message]
2020-06-29 7:03 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-06-18 6:57 ` Jerome Forissier
2020-06-18 7:44 ` Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-04 17:58 ` [PATCHv8 2/3] optee: enable support for multi-stage bus enumeration Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-16 20:56 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-04 17:58 ` [PATCHv8 3/3] tpm_ftpm_tee: register driver on TEE bus Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-16 20:57 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-15 14:32 ` [PATCHv8 0/3] optee: register drivers on optee bus Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-16 8:29 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-06-17 14:26 ` Maxim Uvarov
2020-06-18 8:00 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-06-17 23:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-18 7:56 ` Jens Wiklander
2020-06-23 0:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-16 20:49 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-16 20:54 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAFA6WYMKbm7HxGf_041JPD+wkjXprB9h+2HgTh4z_Ty97udFSw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=arnd@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jerome@forissier.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxim.uvarov@linaro.org \
--cc=peterhuewe@gmx.de \
--cc=tee-dev@lists.linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).