From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com> Cc: "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>, "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>, Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.com>, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 10:33:37 -0700 Message-ID: <20191025103337.1e51c0c9@jacob-builder> (raw) In-Reply-To: <AADFC41AFE54684AB9EE6CBC0274A5D19D5CDDA6@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> Hi Kevin, On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:19:26 +0000 "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com> wrote: > > From: Jacob Pan [mailto:jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 3:55 AM > > > > When supporting guest SVA with emulated IOMMU, the guest PASID > > table is shadowed in VMM. Updates to guest vIOMMU PASID table > > will result in PASID cache flush which will be passed down to > > the host as bind guest PASID calls. > > will be translated into binding/unbinding guest PASID calls to update > the host shadow PASID table. > yours is more precise, will replace. > > > > For the SL page tables, it will be harvested from device's > > default domain (request w/o PASID), or aux domain in case of > > mediated device. > > harvested -> copied or linked to? Kind of the same, but I agree copied is more technical and precise term. Will change. > > > > .-------------. .---------------------------. > > | vIOMMU | | Guest process CR3, FL only| > > | | '---------------------------' > > .----------------/ > > | PASID Entry |--- PASID cache flush - > > '-------------' | > > | | V > > | | CR3 in GPA > > '-------------' > > Guest > > ------| Shadow |--------------------------|-------- > > v v v > > Host > > .-------------. .----------------------. > > | pIOMMU | | Bind FL for GVA-GPA | > > | | '----------------------' > > .----------------/ | > > | PASID Entry | V (Nested xlate) > > '----------------\.------------------------------. > > | | |SL for GPA-HPA, default domain| > > | | '------------------------------' > > '-------------' > > Where: > > - FL = First level/stage one page tables > > - SL = Second level/stage two page tables > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 4 + > > drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c | 184 > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 8 +- > > include/linux/intel-svm.h | 17 ++++ > > 4 files changed, 212 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > > b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index acd1ac787d8b..5fab32fbc4b4 > > 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c > > @@ -6026,6 +6026,10 @@ const struct iommu_ops intel_iommu_ops = { > > .dev_disable_feat = intel_iommu_dev_disable_feat, > > .is_attach_deferred = > > intel_iommu_is_attach_deferred, .pgsize_bitmap = > > INTEL_IOMMU_PGSIZES, +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM > > + .sva_bind_gpasid = intel_svm_bind_gpasid, > > + .sva_unbind_gpasid = intel_svm_unbind_gpasid, > > +#endif > > again, pure PASID management logic should be separated from SVM. > I am not following, these two functions are SVM functionality, not pure PASID management which is already separated in ioasid.c > > }; > > > > static void quirk_iommu_igfx(struct pci_dev *dev) > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c > > index a18b02a9709d..ae13a310cf96 100644 > > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-svm.c > > @@ -216,6 +216,190 @@ static LIST_HEAD(global_svm_list); > > list_for_each_entry(sdev, &svm->devs, list) \ > > if (dev == sdev->dev) \ > > > > +int intel_svm_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, > > + struct device *dev, > > + struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data *data) > > +{ > > + struct intel_iommu *iommu = intel_svm_device_to_iommu(dev); > > + struct dmar_domain *ddomain; > > + struct intel_svm_dev *sdev; > > + struct intel_svm *svm; > > + int ret = 0; > > + > > + if (WARN_ON(!iommu) || !data) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (data->version != IOMMU_GPASID_BIND_VERSION_1 || > > + data->format != IOMMU_PASID_FORMAT_INTEL_VTD) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + if (dev_is_pci(dev)) { > > + /* VT-d supports devices with full 20 bit PASIDs > > only */ > > + if (pci_max_pasids(to_pci_dev(dev)) != PASID_MAX) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + } > > what about non-pci devices? It just moves forward w/o any check here? > Good catch, we only support PCI-device on Intel. Even mdev has to pass the pdev to bind. Will add the else case. > > + > > + /* > > + * We only check host PASID range, we have no knowledge to > > check > > + * guest PASID range nor do we use the guest PASID. > > + */ > > + if (data->hpasid <= 0 || data->hpasid >= PASID_MAX) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + > > + ddomain = to_dmar_domain(domain); > > + /* REVISIT: > > + * Sanity check adddress width and paging mode support > > + * width matching in two dimensions: > > + * 1. paging mode CPU <= IOMMU > > + * 2. address width Guest <= Host. > > + */ > > Is lacking of above logic harmful? If not, we should add > It is better to add the check now, not solely rely on QEMU. > > + mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex); > > + svm = ioasid_find(NULL, data->hpasid, NULL); > > + if (IS_ERR(svm)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(svm); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + if (svm) { > > + /* > > + * If we found svm for the PASID, there must be at > > + * least one device bond, otherwise svm should be > > freed. > > + */ > > + BUG_ON(list_empty(&svm->devs)); > > + > > + for_each_svm_dev(svm, dev) { > > + /* In case of multiple sub-devices of the > > same pdev assigned, we should > > + * allow multiple bind calls with the same > > PASID and pdev. > > + */ > > + sdev->users++; > > + goto out; > > sorry if I overlooked, but I didn't see any check on the PASID > actually belonging to this process. At least should check the > match between svm->mm and get_task_mm? also check > whether a previous binding between this hpasid and gpasid > already exists. > We had some discussions on whom should be responsible for checking ownership. I tend to think VFIO is right place but I guess we can also double check here. Good point, we should check the same H-G PASID bind already exists. > > + } > > + } else { > > + /* We come here when PASID has never been bond to a > > device. */ > > + svm = kzalloc(sizeof(*svm), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!svm) { > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + /* REVISIT: upper layer/VFIO can track host > > process that bind the PASID. > > + * ioasid_set = mm might be sufficient for vfio to > > check pasid VMM > > + * ownership. > > + */ > > Is it correct to leave the check to the caller? > Ditto, we will double check. But since this is related to the guest, I feel iommu driver check mm might be too restrictive. I am not sure if any VMM could have more than one process? One process does alloc, the other does bind. > > + svm->mm = get_task_mm(current); > > + svm->pasid = data->hpasid; > > + if (data->flags & IOMMU_SVA_GPASID_VAL) { > > + svm->gpasid = data->gpasid; > > + svm->flags |= SVM_FLAG_GUEST_PASID; > > + } > > + ioasid_set_data(data->hpasid, svm); > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&svm->devs); > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&svm->list); > > + > > + mmput(svm->mm); > > + } > > + sdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*sdev), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!sdev) { > > + if (list_empty(&svm->devs)) > > + kfree(svm); > > + ret = -ENOMEM; > > + goto out; > > + } > > + sdev->dev = dev; > > + sdev->users = 1; > > + > > + /* Set up device context entry for PASID if not enabled > > already */ > > + ret = intel_iommu_enable_pasid(iommu, sdev->dev); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable PASID > > capability\n"); > > + kfree(sdev); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + /* > > + * For guest bind, we need to set up PASID table entry as > > follows: > > + * - FLPM matches guest paging mode > > + * - turn on nested mode > > + * - SL guest address width matching > > + */ > > + ret = intel_pasid_setup_nested(iommu, > > + dev, > > + (pgd_t *)data->gpgd, > > + data->hpasid, > > + &data->vtd, > > + ddomain, > > + data->addr_width); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "Failed to set up PASID %llu in > > nested mode, Err %d\n", > > + data->hpasid, ret); > > + kfree(sdev); > > disable pasid? revert ioasid_set_data? > Good catch, will do. > > + goto out; > > + } > > + svm->flags |= SVM_FLAG_GUEST_MODE; > > + > > + init_rcu_head(&sdev->rcu); > > + list_add_rcu(&sdev->list, &svm->devs); > > + out: > > + mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex); > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > +int intel_svm_unbind_gpasid(struct device *dev, int pasid) > > +{ > > + struct intel_svm_dev *sdev; > > + struct intel_iommu *iommu; > > + struct intel_svm *svm; > > + int ret = -EINVAL; > > + > > + mutex_lock(&pasid_mutex); > > + iommu = intel_svm_device_to_iommu(dev); > > + if (!iommu) > > + goto out; > > + > > + svm = ioasid_find(NULL, pasid, NULL); > > + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(svm)) { > > + ret = PTR_ERR(svm); > > + goto out; > > + } > > + > > + for_each_svm_dev(svm, dev) { > > + ret = 0; > > + sdev->users--; > > + if (!sdev->users) { > > + list_del_rcu(&sdev->list); > > + intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, dev, > > svm- > > >pasid); > > + /* TODO: Drain in flight PRQ for the PASID > > since it > > + * may get reused soon, we don't want to > > + * confuse with its previous life. > > + * intel_svm_drain_prq(dev, pasid); > > + */ > > + kfree_rcu(sdev, rcu); > > + > > + if (list_empty(&svm->devs)) { > > + list_del(&svm->list); > > + kfree(svm); > > + /* > > + * We do not free PASID here until > > explicit call > > + * from VFIO to free. The PASID > > life cycle > > + * management is largely tied to > > VFIO management > > + * of assigned device life cycles. > > In case of > > + * guest exit without a explicit > > free PASID call, > > + * the responsibility lies in VFIO > > layer to free > > + * the PASIDs allocated for the > > guest. > > + * For security reasons, VFIO has > > to track the > > + * PASID ownership per guest > > anyway to ensure > > + * that PASID allocated by one > > guest cannot be > > + * used by another. > > + */ > > + ioasid_set_data(pasid, NULL); > > + } > > + } > > + break; > > + } > > + out: > > + mutex_unlock(&pasid_mutex); > > + > > + return ret; > > +} > > + > > int intel_svm_bind_mm(struct device *dev, int *pasid, int flags, > > struct svm_dev_ops *ops) > > { > > struct intel_iommu *iommu = intel_svm_device_to_iommu(dev); > > diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h > > b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h index 3dba6ad3e9ad..6c74c71b1ebf > > 100644 --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h > > +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h > > @@ -673,7 +673,9 @@ int intel_iommu_enable_pasid(struct intel_iommu > > *iommu, struct device *dev); > > int intel_svm_init(struct intel_iommu *iommu); > > extern int intel_svm_enable_prq(struct intel_iommu *iommu); > > extern int intel_svm_finish_prq(struct intel_iommu *iommu); > > - > > +extern int intel_svm_bind_gpasid(struct iommu_domain *domain, > > + struct device *dev, struct iommu_gpasid_bind_data > > *data); +extern int intel_svm_unbind_gpasid(struct device *dev, int > > pasid); struct svm_dev_ops; > > > > struct intel_svm_dev { > > @@ -690,9 +692,13 @@ struct intel_svm_dev { > > struct intel_svm { > > struct mmu_notifier notifier; > > struct mm_struct *mm; > > + > > struct intel_iommu *iommu; > > int flags; > > int pasid; > > + int gpasid; /* Guest PASID in case of vSVA bind with > > non-identity host > > + * to guest PASID mapping. > > + */ > > struct list_head devs; > > struct list_head list; > > }; > > diff --git a/include/linux/intel-svm.h b/include/linux/intel-svm.h > > index 94f047a8a845..a2c189ad0b01 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/intel-svm.h > > +++ b/include/linux/intel-svm.h > > @@ -44,6 +44,23 @@ struct svm_dev_ops { > > * do such IOTLB flushes automatically. > > */ > > #define SVM_FLAG_SUPERVISOR_MODE (1<<1) > > +/* > > + * The SVM_FLAG_GUEST_MODE flag is used when a guest process bind > > to a device. > > + * In this case the mm_struct is in the guest kernel or userspace, > > its life > > + * cycle is managed by VMM and VFIO layer. For IOMMU driver, this > > API provides > > + * means to bind/unbind guest CR3 with PASIDs allocated for a > > device. > > + */ > > +#define SVM_FLAG_GUEST_MODE (1<<2) > > +/* > > + * The SVM_FLAG_GUEST_PASID flag is used when a guest has its own > > PASID space, > > + * which requires guest and host PASID translation at both > > directions. We keep > > + * track of guest PASID in order to provide lookup service to > > device drivers. > > + * One such example is a physical function (PF) driver that > > supports mediated > > + * device (mdev) assignment. Guest programming of mdev > > configuration space can > > + * only be done with guest PASID, therefore PF driver needs to > > find the matching > > + * host PASID to program the real hardware. > > + */ > > +#define SVM_FLAG_GUEST_PASID (1<<3) > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_INTEL_IOMMU_SVM > > > > -- > > 2.7.4 > [Jacob Pan] _______________________________________________ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply index Thread overview: 78+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2019-10-24 19:54 [PATCH v7 00/11] Nested Shared Virtual Address (SVA) VT-d support Jacob Pan 2019-10-24 19:54 ` [PATCH v7 01/11] iommu/vt-d: Cache virtual command capability register Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 2:53 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-25 6:06 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-11-08 10:32 ` Auger Eric 2019-10-24 19:54 ` [PATCH v7 02/11] iommu/vt-d: Enlightened PASID allocation Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 6:19 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-29 17:14 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-29 18:16 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-11-08 10:33 ` Auger Eric 2019-11-08 22:22 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-24 19:54 ` [PATCH v7 03/11] iommu/vt-d: Add custom allocator for IOASID Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 2:30 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-25 4:43 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 6:40 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-25 14:39 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-25 15:52 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-28 22:49 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-29 2:22 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-25 6:31 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-28 22:52 ` Jacob Pan 2019-11-08 10:40 ` Auger Eric 2019-11-08 22:26 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-24 19:54 ` [PATCH v7 04/11] iommu/vt-d: Replace Intel specific PASID allocator with IOASID Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 5:47 ` Lu Baolu 2019-11-01 18:29 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 6:41 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-28 22:46 ` Jacob Pan 2019-11-08 11:30 ` Auger Eric 2019-11-08 22:55 ` Jacob Pan 2019-11-12 9:54 ` Auger Eric 2019-10-24 19:54 ` [PATCH v7 05/11] iommu/vt-d: Move domain helper to header Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 5:26 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-24 19:54 ` [PATCH v7 06/11] iommu/vt-d: Avoid duplicated code for PASID setup Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 5:32 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-25 6:42 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-28 22:41 ` Jacob Pan 2019-11-12 9:54 ` Auger Eric 2019-10-24 19:55 ` [PATCH v7 07/11] iommu/vt-d: Add nested translation helper function Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 7:04 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-11-01 21:10 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 15:04 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-25 16:06 ` Jacob Pan 2019-11-08 13:55 ` Auger Eric 2019-10-24 19:55 ` [PATCH v7 08/11] iommu/vt-d: Misc macro clean up for SVM Jacob Pan 2019-10-26 1:00 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-28 22:38 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-24 19:55 ` [PATCH v7 09/11] iommu/vt-d: Add bind guest PASID support Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 7:19 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-25 17:33 ` Jacob Pan [this message] 2019-10-28 6:03 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-28 16:02 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-29 7:57 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-29 16:11 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-29 18:04 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-29 2:33 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-26 2:01 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-28 22:29 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-29 2:54 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-29 4:11 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-29 5:04 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-24 19:55 ` [PATCH v7 10/11] iommu/vt-d: Support flushing more translation cache types Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 7:21 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-11-01 21:30 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-26 2:22 ` Lu Baolu 2019-11-01 21:28 ` Jacob Pan 2019-11-08 16:18 ` Auger Eric 2019-11-08 23:05 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-24 19:55 ` [PATCH v7 11/11] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate function Jacob Pan 2019-10-25 7:27 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-26 2:40 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-26 7:03 ` Lu Baolu 2019-10-28 6:06 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-28 16:10 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-29 18:52 ` Tian, Kevin 2019-10-29 19:25 ` Jacob Pan 2019-10-28 16:13 ` Jacob Pan 2019-11-12 10:28 ` Auger Eric
Reply instructions: You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20191025103337.1e51c0c9@jacob-builder \ --to=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \ --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \ --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \ --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \ --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \ --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.com \ --cc=jic23@kernel.org \ --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org Archives are clonable: git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/0 linux-iommu/git/0.git # If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may # initialize and index your mirror using the following commands: public-inbox-init -V2 linux-iommu linux-iommu/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu \ iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org public-inbox-index linux-iommu Example config snippet for mirrors Newsgroup available over NNTP: nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.linux-foundation.lists.iommu AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git