IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
To: "Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
Cc: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	"Guo, Kaijie" <kaijie.guo@intel.com>,
	"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	"Pan, Jacob jun" <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	"Tian, Jun J" <jun.j.tian@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Track device aux-attach with subdevice_domain_info.
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 03:59:27 +0000
Message-ID: <DM5PR11MB1435173888D48C2C894E1603C3DE0@DM5PR11MB1435.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201222122128.233d928d@jacob-builder>

Hi Jacob,

> From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2020 4:21 AM
>
> Hi Yi,
> 
> On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 08:03:51 +0800, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > In existing code, if wanting to loop all devices attached to a domain,
> > current code can only loop the devices which are attached to the domain
> > via normal manner. While for devices attached via auxiliary manner, this
> > is subdevice, they are not tracked in the domain. This patch adds struct
> How about "In the existing code, loop all devices attached to a domain does
> not include sub-devices attached via iommu_aux_attach_device()."

looks good. will refine accordingly. 😊

> 
> > subdevice_domain_info which is created per domain attachment via
> auxiliary
> > manner. So that such devices are also tracked in domain.
> >
> > This was found by when I'm working on the belwo patch, There is no device
> > in domain->devices, thus unable to get the cap and ecap of iommu unit. But
> > this domain actually has one sub-device which is attached via aux-manner.
> > This patch fixes the issue.
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/1599734733-6431-17-git-send-email-
> yi.l.liu@intel.com/
> >
> > But looks like, it doesn't affect me only. Such auxiliary track should be
> > there for example if wanting to flush device_iotlb for a domain which has
> > devices attached by auxiliray manner, then this fix is also necessary.
> Perhaps:
> This fix goes beyond the patch above, such sub-device tracking is
> necessary for other cases. For example, flushing device_iotlb for a domain
> which has sub-devices attached by auxiliary manner.

yep. Baolu also suggested such refine. will tweak in next version.

Regards,
Yi Liu

> 
> > This issue will also be fixed by another patch in this series with some
> > additional changes based on the sudevice tracking framework introduced in
> > this patch.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Xin Zeng <xin.zeng@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xin Zeng <xin.zeng@intel.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> ---
> >  include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 11 ++++-
> >  2 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > index a49afa11673c..4274b4acc325 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > @@ -1881,6 +1881,7 @@ static struct dmar_domain *alloc_domain(int
> flags)
> >  		domain->flags |= DOMAIN_FLAG_USE_FIRST_LEVEL;
> >  	domain->has_iotlb_device = false;
> >  	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->devices);
> > +	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->sub_devices);
> >
> >  	return domain;
> >  }
> > @@ -5172,33 +5173,79 @@ is_aux_domain(struct device *dev, struct
> > iommu_domain *domain) domain->type ==
> IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED;
> >  }
> >
> > +static inline
> > +void _auxiliary_link_device(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> > +			    struct subdevice_domain_info *subinfo,
> > +			    struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	subinfo->users++;
> > +}
> > +
> why pass in more arguments than subinfo? the function name does not match
> what it does, seems just refcount inc.
> 
> > +static inline
> > +int _auxiliary_unlink_device(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> > +			     struct subdevice_domain_info *subinfo,
> > +			     struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	subinfo->users--;
> > +	return subinfo->users;
> ditto. why not just
>  	return subinfo->users--;
> 
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void auxiliary_link_device(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> >  				  struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_domain_info *info = get_domain_info(dev);
> > +	struct subdevice_domain_info *subinfo;
> >
> >  	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
> >  	if (WARN_ON(!info))
> >  		return;
> >
> > +	subinfo = kzalloc(sizeof(*subinfo), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +	if (!subinfo)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	subinfo->domain = domain;
> > +	subinfo->dev = dev;
> > +	list_add(&subinfo->link_domain, &info->auxiliary_domains);
> > +	list_add(&subinfo->link_phys, &domain->sub_devices);
> > +	_auxiliary_link_device(domain, subinfo, dev);
> or just opencode subinfo->users++?
> >  	domain->auxd_refcnt++;
> > -	list_add(&domain->auxd, &info->auxiliary_domains);
> >  }
> >
> > -static void auxiliary_unlink_device(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> > -				    struct device *dev)
> > +static struct subdevice_domain_info *
> > +subdevice_domain_info_lookup(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct
> device
> > *dev) +{
> > +	struct subdevice_domain_info *subinfo;
> > +
> > +	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(subinfo, &domain->sub_devices, link_phys)
> > +		if (subinfo->dev == dev)
> > +			return subinfo;
> > +
> > +	return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int auxiliary_unlink_device(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> > +				   struct subdevice_domain_info *subinfo,
> > +				   struct device *dev)
> >  {
> >  	struct device_domain_info *info = get_domain_info(dev);
> > +	int ret;
> >
> >  	assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
> >  	if (WARN_ON(!info))
> > -		return;
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> >
> > -	list_del(&domain->auxd);
> > +	ret = _auxiliary_unlink_device(domain, subinfo, dev);
> > +	if (ret == 0) {
> > +		list_del(&subinfo->link_domain);
> > +		list_del(&subinfo->link_phys);
> > +		kfree(subinfo);
> > +	}
> >  	domain->auxd_refcnt--;
> >
> > -	if (!domain->auxd_refcnt && domain->default_pasid > 0)
> > -		ioasid_free(domain->default_pasid);
> > +	return ret;
> >  }
> >
> >  static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct dmar_domain *domain,
> > @@ -5207,6 +5254,8 @@ static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct
> dmar_domain
> > *domain, int ret;
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> >  	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> > +	struct device_domain_info *info = get_domain_info(dev);
> > +	struct subdevice_domain_info *subinfo;
> >
> >  	iommu = device_to_iommu(dev, NULL, NULL);
> >  	if (!iommu)
> > @@ -5227,6 +5276,12 @@ static int aux_domain_add_dev(struct
> dmar_domain
> > *domain, }
> >
> >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > +	subinfo = subdevice_domain_info_lookup(domain, dev);
> > +	if (subinfo) {
> > +		_auxiliary_link_device(domain, subinfo, dev);
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> >  	/*
> >  	 * iommu->lock must be held to attach domain to iommu and setup
> > the
> >  	 * pasid entry for second level translation.
> > @@ -5270,6 +5325,7 @@ static void aux_domain_remove_dev(struct
> > dmar_domain *domain, struct device_domain_info *info;
> >  	struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> >  	unsigned long flags;
> > +	struct subdevice_domain_info *subinfo;
> >
> >  	if (!is_aux_domain(dev, &domain->domain))
> >  		return;
> > @@ -5278,14 +5334,26 @@ static void aux_domain_remove_dev(struct
> > dmar_domain *domain, info = get_domain_info(dev);
> >  	iommu = info->iommu;
> >
> > -	auxiliary_unlink_device(domain, dev);
> > +	subinfo = subdevice_domain_info_lookup(domain, dev);
> > +	if (!subinfo) {
> > +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > +		return;
> > +	}
> >
> > -	spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > -	intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu, dev, domain->default_pasid,
> > false);
> > -	domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
> > -	spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	if (auxiliary_unlink_device(domain, subinfo, dev) == 0) {
> > +		spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > +		intel_pasid_tear_down_entry(iommu,
> > +					    dev,
> > +					    domain->default_pasid,
> > +					    false);
> > +		domain_detach_iommu(domain, iommu);
> > +		spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > +	}
> >
> >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
> > +
> > +	if (!domain->auxd_refcnt && domain->default_pasid > 0)
> > +		ioasid_free(domain->default_pasid);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int prepare_domain_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > diff --git a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > index 94522685a0d9..1fb3d6ab719a 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/intel-iommu.h
> > @@ -537,7 +537,7 @@ struct dmar_domain {
> >
> >  	bool has_iotlb_device;
> >  	struct list_head devices;	/* all devices' list */
> > -	struct list_head auxd;		/* link to device's
> > auxiliary list */
> > +	struct list_head sub_devices;	/* all devices' list
> > attached via aux-attach */ struct iova_domain iovad;	/* iova's
> > that belong to this domain */
> >  	struct dma_pte	*pgd;		/* virtual address */
> > @@ -636,6 +636,15 @@ struct device_domain_info {
> >  	struct pasid_table *pasid_table; /* pasid table */
> >  };
> >
> > +/* Aux attach device domain info */
> > +struct subdevice_domain_info {
> > +	struct device *dev;
> > +	struct dmar_domain *domain;
> > +	struct list_head link_phys;	/* link to phys device
> > siblings */
> > +	struct list_head link_domain;	/* link to domain siblings
> > */
> > +	int users;
> > +};
> > +
> >  static inline void __iommu_flush_cache(
> >  	struct intel_iommu *iommu, void *addr, int size)
> >  {
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jacob
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply index

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-20  0:03 [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vtd-: Misc fixes on scalable mode Liu Yi L
2020-12-20  0:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] iommu/vt-d: Move intel_iommu info from struct intel_svm to struct intel_svm_dev Liu Yi L
2020-12-19  6:50   ` Lu Baolu
2020-12-21  1:43     ` Guo, Kaijie
2020-12-20  0:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] iommu/vt-d: Track device aux-attach with subdevice_domain_info Liu Yi L
2020-12-19  6:52   ` Lu Baolu
2020-12-22 20:21   ` Jacob Pan
2020-12-23  3:59     ` Liu, Yi L [this message]
2020-12-20  0:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] iommu/vt-d: A fix to iommu_flush_dev_iotlb() for aux-domain Liu Yi L
2020-12-19  6:52   ` Lu Baolu
2020-12-22 18:17 ` [PATCH 0/4] iommu/vtd-: Misc fixes on scalable mode Jacob Pan
2020-12-23  3:57   ` Liu, Yi L

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM5PR11MB1435173888D48C2C894E1603C3DE0@DM5PR11MB1435.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jun.j.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kaijie.guo@intel.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

IOMMU Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/0 linux-iommu/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-iommu linux-iommu/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu \
		iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
	public-inbox-index linux-iommu

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.linux-foundation.lists.iommu


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git