iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	"Grimm, Jon" <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
	baekhw@google.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [rfc 0/6] unencrypted atomic DMA pools with dynamic expansion
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2020 16:05:03 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2003011535510.213582@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2002280118461.165532@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

set_memory_decrypted() may block so it is not possible to do non-blocking
allocations through the DMA API for devices that required unencrypted
memory.

The solution is to expand the atomic DMA pools for the various possible
gfp requirements as a means to prevent an unnecessary depletion of lowmem.

These atomic DMA pools are kept unencrypted so they can immediately be
used for non-blocking allocations.  Since the need for this type of memory
depends on the kernel config and devices being used, these pools are also
dynamically expandable.

Some of these patches could be squashed into each other, but they were
separated out to ease code review.

This patchset is based on 5.6-rc4.
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig            |   1 +
 drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c   |   5 +-
 include/linux/dma-direct.h  |   2 +
 include/linux/dma-mapping.h |   6 +-
 kernel/dma/direct.c         |  17 ++--
 kernel/dma/remap.c          | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 6 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-02  0:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-01  1:54 [rfc] dma-mapping: preallocate unencrypted DMA atomic pool David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-06 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-07 10:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-07 19:57     ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-09 14:31       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-09 18:58         ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-17 15:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-02-28  9:27   ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02  0:05     ` David Rientjes via iommu [this message]
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 1/6] dma-mapping: pass device to atomic allocation functions David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 2/6] dma-remap: add additional atomic pools to map to gfp mask David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 3/6] dma-remap: wire up the atomic pools depending on " David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:43         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 4/6] dma-remap: dynamically expanding atomic pools David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-03 22:29         ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 5/6] dma-direct: atomic allocations must come from unencrypted pools David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:44         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-07  0:36           ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-10 18:47             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 6/6] dma-remap: double the default DMA coherent pool size David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:45         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 21:21       ` [rfc v2 0/6] unencrypted atomic DMA pools with dynamic expansion David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 1/6] dma-remap: separate DMA atomic pools from direct remap code David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14  6:35           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 2/6] dma-pool: add additional coherent pools to map to gfp mask David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 3/6] dma-pool: dynamically expanding atomic pools David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 4/6] dma-direct: atomic allocations must come from atomic coherent pools David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-09 21:24           ` Tom Lendacky
2020-04-14 19:18             ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14  6:43           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 19:20             ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 5/6] x86/mm: unencrypted non-blocking DMA allocations use " David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 6/6] dma-pool: scale the default DMA coherent pool size with memory capacity David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-10 14:55         ` [rfc v2 3/6] dma-pool: dynamically expanding atomic pools Hillf Danton
2020-04-10 19:37           ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14  6:44             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 19:23               ` David Rientjes via iommu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2003011535510.213582@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baekhw@google.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).