iommu.lists.linux-foundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Rientjes via iommu <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>
Cc: "Singh, Brijesh" <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	"Grimm, Jon" <jon.grimm@amd.com>,
	baekhw@google.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [rfc 4/6] dma-remap: dynamically expanding atomic pools
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 14:29:34 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2003031424400.41997@chino.kir.corp.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2003011537440.213582@chino.kir.corp.google.com>

On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, David Rientjes wrote:

> When an atomic pool becomes fully depleted because it is now relied upon
> for all non-blocking allocations through the DMA API, allow background
> expansion of each pool by a kworker.
> 
> When an atomic pool has less than the default size of memory left, kick
> off a kworker to dynamically expand the pool in the background.  The pool
> is doubled in size.
> 
> This allows the default size to be kept quite low when one or more of the
> atomic pools is not used.
> 
> Also switch over some node ids to the more appropriate NUMA_NO_NODE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> ---
>  kernel/dma/remap.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/remap.c b/kernel/dma/remap.c
> --- a/kernel/dma/remap.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/remap.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>  #include <linux/genalloc.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/vmalloc.h>
> +#include <linux/workqueue.h>
>  
>  struct page **dma_common_find_pages(void *cpu_addr)
>  {
> @@ -104,7 +105,10 @@ static struct gen_pool *atomic_pool_dma32 __ro_after_init;
>  static struct gen_pool *atomic_pool_normal __ro_after_init;
>  
>  #define DEFAULT_DMA_COHERENT_POOL_SIZE  SZ_256K
> -static size_t atomic_pool_size __initdata = DEFAULT_DMA_COHERENT_POOL_SIZE;
> +static size_t atomic_pool_size = DEFAULT_DMA_COHERENT_POOL_SIZE;
> +
> +/* Dynamic background expansion when the atomic pool is near capacity */
> +struct work_struct atomic_pool_work;
>  
>  static int __init early_coherent_pool(char *p)
>  {
> @@ -113,14 +117,14 @@ static int __init early_coherent_pool(char *p)
>  }
>  early_param("coherent_pool", early_coherent_pool);
>  
> -static int __init __dma_atomic_pool_init(struct gen_pool **pool,
> -					 size_t pool_size, gfp_t gfp)
> +static int atomic_pool_expand(struct gen_pool *pool, size_t pool_size,
> +			      gfp_t gfp)
>  {
> -	const unsigned int order = get_order(pool_size);
>  	const unsigned long nr_pages = pool_size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> +	const unsigned int order = get_order(pool_size);
>  	struct page *page;
>  	void *addr;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret = -ENOMEM;
>  
>  	if (dev_get_cma_area(NULL))
>  		page = dma_alloc_from_contiguous(NULL, nr_pages, order, false);

There's an issue here if the pool grows too large which would result in
order > MAX_ORDER-1.  We can fix that by limiting order to MAX_ORDER-1 and 
doing nr_pages = 1 << order.

I should also add support for trying smaller page allocations if our 
preferred expansion size results in an allocation failure.

Other than that, I'll remove the RFC tag and send a refreshed series by 
the end of the week unless there are other comments or suggestions to 
factor in.

Thanks!

> @@ -131,38 +135,67 @@ static int __init __dma_atomic_pool_init(struct gen_pool **pool,
>  
>  	arch_dma_prep_coherent(page, pool_size);
>  
> -	*pool = gen_pool_create(PAGE_SHIFT, -1);
> -	if (!*pool)
> -		goto free_page;
> -
>  	addr = dma_common_contiguous_remap(page, pool_size,
>  					   pgprot_dmacoherent(PAGE_KERNEL),
>  					   __builtin_return_address(0));
>  	if (!addr)
> -		goto destroy_genpool;
> +		goto free_page;
>  
> -	ret = gen_pool_add_virt(*pool, (unsigned long)addr, page_to_phys(page),
> -				pool_size, -1);
> +	ret = gen_pool_add_virt(pool, (unsigned long)addr, page_to_phys(page),
> +				pool_size, NUMA_NO_NODE);
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto remove_mapping;
> -	gen_pool_set_algo(*pool, gen_pool_first_fit_order_align, NULL);
>  
> -	pr_info("DMA: preallocated %zu KiB %pGg pool for atomic allocations\n",
> -		pool_size >> 10, &gfp);
>  	return 0;
>  
>  remove_mapping:
>  	dma_common_free_remap(addr, pool_size);
> -destroy_genpool:
> -	gen_pool_destroy(*pool);
> -	*pool = NULL;
>  free_page:
>  	if (!dma_release_from_contiguous(NULL, page, nr_pages))
>  		__free_pages(page, order);
>  out:
> -	pr_err("DMA: failed to allocate %zu KiB %pGg pool for atomic allocation\n",
> -		atomic_pool_size >> 10, &gfp);
> -	return -ENOMEM;
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void atomic_pool_resize(struct gen_pool *pool, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	if (pool && gen_pool_avail(pool) < atomic_pool_size)
> +		atomic_pool_expand(pool, gen_pool_size(pool), gfp);
> +}
> +
> +static void atomic_pool_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA))
> +		atomic_pool_resize(atomic_pool, GFP_DMA);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA32))
> +		atomic_pool_resize(atomic_pool_dma32, GFP_DMA32);
> +	atomic_pool_resize(atomic_pool_normal, GFP_KERNEL);
> +}
> +
> +static int __init __dma_atomic_pool_init(struct gen_pool **pool,
> +					 size_t pool_size, gfp_t gfp)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	*pool = gen_pool_create(PAGE_SHIFT, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> +	if (!*pool)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	gen_pool_set_algo(*pool, gen_pool_first_fit_order_align, NULL);
> +
> +	ret = atomic_pool_expand(*pool, pool_size, gfp);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		gen_pool_destroy(*pool);
> +		*pool = NULL;
> +		pr_err("DMA: failed to allocate %zu KiB %pGg pool for atomic allocation\n",
> +		       atomic_pool_size >> 10, &gfp);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +
> +	pr_info("DMA: preallocated %zu KiB %pGg pool for atomic allocations\n",
> +		pool_size >> 10, &gfp);
> +	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int __init dma_atomic_pool_init(void)
> @@ -170,6 +203,8 @@ static int __init dma_atomic_pool_init(void)
>  	int ret = 0;
>  	int err;
>  
> +	INIT_WORK(&atomic_pool_work, atomic_pool_work_fn);
> +
>  	ret = __dma_atomic_pool_init(&atomic_pool_normal, atomic_pool_size,
>  				     GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ZONE_DMA)) {
> @@ -231,6 +266,8 @@ void *dma_alloc_from_pool(struct device *dev, size_t size,
>  		ptr = (void *)val;
>  		memset(ptr, 0, size);
>  	}
> +	if (gen_pool_avail(pool) < atomic_pool_size)
> +		schedule_work(&atomic_pool_work);
>  
>  	return ptr;
>  }
> 
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-03 22:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-01  1:54 [rfc] dma-mapping: preallocate unencrypted DMA atomic pool David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-06 17:34 ` Robin Murphy
2020-01-07 10:54   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-07 19:57     ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-09 14:31       ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-01-09 18:58         ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-01-17 15:28 ` Tom Lendacky
2020-02-28  9:27   ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02  0:05     ` [rfc 0/6] unencrypted atomic DMA pools with dynamic expansion David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 1/6] dma-mapping: pass device to atomic allocation functions David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 2/6] dma-remap: add additional atomic pools to map to gfp mask David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:42         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 3/6] dma-remap: wire up the atomic pools depending on " David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:43         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 4/6] dma-remap: dynamically expanding atomic pools David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-03 22:29         ` David Rientjes via iommu [this message]
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 5/6] dma-direct: atomic allocations must come from unencrypted pools David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:44         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-07  0:36           ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-10 18:47             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-02  0:05       ` [rfc 6/6] dma-remap: double the default DMA coherent pool size David Rientjes via iommu
2020-03-05 15:45         ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 21:21       ` [rfc v2 0/6] unencrypted atomic DMA pools with dynamic expansion David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 1/6] dma-remap: separate DMA atomic pools from direct remap code David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14  6:35           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 2/6] dma-pool: add additional coherent pools to map to gfp mask David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 3/6] dma-pool: dynamically expanding atomic pools David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 4/6] dma-direct: atomic allocations must come from atomic coherent pools David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-09 21:24           ` Tom Lendacky
2020-04-14 19:18             ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14  6:43           ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 19:20             ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 5/6] x86/mm: unencrypted non-blocking DMA allocations use " David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-08 21:21         ` [rfc v2 6/6] dma-pool: scale the default DMA coherent pool size with memory capacity David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-10 14:55         ` [rfc v2 3/6] dma-pool: dynamically expanding atomic pools Hillf Danton
2020-04-10 19:37           ` David Rientjes via iommu
2020-04-14  6:44             ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-14 19:23               ` David Rientjes via iommu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.2003031424400.41997@chino.kir.corp.google.com \
    --to=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=baekhw@google.com \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jon.grimm@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).