From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
To: will@kernel.org
Cc: bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
gregory.clement@bootlin.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 08/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Get rid of weird "atomic" write
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2019 19:37:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c578e786b3994bd21b174d9af44533ff082aff52.1565892337.git.robin.murphy@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1565892337.git.robin.murphy@arm.com>
The smmu_write_atomic_lq oddity made some sense when the context
format was effectively tied to CONFIG_64BIT, but these days it's
simpler to just pick an explicit access size based on the format
for the one-and-a-half times we actually care.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 23 +++++++----------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 5b12e96d7878..24b4de1a4185 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
@@ -83,17 +83,6 @@
((smmu->options & ARM_SMMU_OPT_SECURE_CFG_ACCESS) \
? 0x400 : 0))
-/*
- * Some 64-bit registers only make sense to write atomically, but in such
- * cases all the data relevant to AArch32 formats lies within the lower word,
- * therefore this actually makes more sense than it might first appear.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
-#define smmu_write_atomic_lq writeq_relaxed
-#else
-#define smmu_write_atomic_lq writel_relaxed
-#endif
-
/* Translation context bank */
#define ARM_SMMU_CB(smmu, n) ((smmu)->base + (((smmu)->numpage + (n)) << (smmu)->pgshift))
@@ -533,7 +522,10 @@ static void arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_s2(unsigned long iova, size_t size,
reg += leaf ? ARM_SMMU_CB_S2_TLBIIPAS2L : ARM_SMMU_CB_S2_TLBIIPAS2;
iova >>= 12;
do {
- smmu_write_atomic_lq(iova, reg);
+ if (smmu_domain->cfg.fmt == ARM_SMMU_CTX_FMT_AARCH64)
+ writeq_relaxed(iova, reg);
+ else
+ writel_relaxed(iova, reg);
iova += granule >> 12;
} while (size -= granule);
}
@@ -1371,11 +1363,10 @@ static phys_addr_t arm_smmu_iova_to_phys_hard(struct iommu_domain *domain,
cb_base = ARM_SMMU_CB(smmu, cfg->cbndx);
spin_lock_irqsave(&smmu_domain->cb_lock, flags);
- /* ATS1 registers can only be written atomically */
va = iova & ~0xfffUL;
- if (smmu->version == ARM_SMMU_V2)
- smmu_write_atomic_lq(va, cb_base + ARM_SMMU_CB_ATS1PR);
- else /* Register is only 32-bit in v1 */
+ if (cfg->fmt == ARM_SMMU_CTX_FMT_AARCH64)
+ writeq_relaxed(va, cb_base + ARM_SMMU_CB_ATS1PR);
+ else
writel_relaxed(va, cb_base + ARM_SMMU_CB_ATS1PR);
if (readl_poll_timeout_atomic(cb_base + ARM_SMMU_CB_ATSR, tmp,
--
2.21.0.dirty
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-15 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-15 18:37 [PATCH v2 00/17] Arm SMMU refactoring Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 01/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Mask TLBI address correctly Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 02/17] iommu/qcom: Mask TLBI addresses correctly Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 03/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert GR0 registers to bitfields Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 04/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert GR1 " Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 05/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Convert context bank " Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 06/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Rework cb_base handling Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 07/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Split arm_smmu_tlb_inv_range_nosync() Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` Robin Murphy [this message]
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 09/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Abstract GR1 accesses Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 10/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Abstract context bank accesses Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 11/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Abstract GR0 accesses Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 12/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Rename arm-smmu-regs.h Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 13/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Add implementation infrastructure Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 14/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Move Secure access quirk to implementation Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 15/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Add configuration implementation hook Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 16/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Add reset " Robin Murphy
2019-08-15 18:37 ` [PATCH v2 17/17] iommu/arm-smmu: Add context init " Robin Murphy
2019-08-20 10:15 ` Vivek Gautam
2019-08-20 13:00 ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-19 15:56 ` [PATCH v2 00/17] Arm SMMU refactoring Will Deacon
2019-08-19 18:10 ` Robin Murphy
2019-08-20 7:04 ` Will Deacon
2019-08-20 8:20 ` Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c578e786b3994bd21b174d9af44533ff082aff52.1565892337.git.robin.murphy@arm.com \
--to=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).