From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
bp@amd64.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v5] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks
Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:25:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110310102511.GA30886@merkur.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D78971C.6090107@suse.cz>
> One way without extending the current rules could be:
>
> ifdef CONFIG_CC_WERROR
> Werror := -Werror
> endif
>
> CFLAGS_sched.o := $(Werror)
> CFLAGS_another.o := $(Werror)
>
> What do you think?
We could extend kbuild to support something like this:
ccflags-<filename>-y := -Werror
Sample:
ccflags-sched.o-$(CONFIG_WERROR) := -Werror
The above is a nice counterpart to the existing ccflags-y.
And we could then deprecate CLFAGS_<filename> as we have today.
To remove options we could use:
ccflags-<filename>-remove-y := -pg
This is a replacement of the undocumented CFLAGS_REMOVE_<filename> variant.
Today:
ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
CFLAGS_REMOVE_lockdep.o = -pg
endif
Could be replaced with:
ccflags-lockdep.o-remove-$(CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER) := -pg
The ifdef often cover more than one file so we save less lines in
reality than the example says.
All looks rather trivial to implement.
But it is maybe a bit too cryptic?
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-03-10 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-03-01 8:35 [PATCH -v5] kbuild: Add extra gcc checks Borislav Petkov
2011-03-09 14:45 ` Michal Marek
2011-03-09 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-09 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-09 17:56 ` Sam Ravnborg
2011-03-10 9:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-10 9:17 ` Michal Marek
2011-03-10 10:25 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2011-03-10 9:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2011-03-10 11:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110310102511.GA30886@merkur.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bp@amd64.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).