* "header-y" versus "unifdef-y"?
@ 2009-07-22 12:25 Robert P. J. Day
2009-07-22 18:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2009-07-22 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kbuild devel list
is it my imagination, or did someone recently propose that there
will soon be no distinction between those two Kbuild directives since
it's just as easy to "unifdef" all of them, no matter what? has that
patch already been submitted for the next major release?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
"Kernel Newbie Corner" column @ linux.com: http://cli.gs/WG6WYX
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: "header-y" versus "unifdef-y"?
2009-07-22 12:25 "header-y" versus "unifdef-y"? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2009-07-22 18:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-07-22 18:32 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sam Ravnborg @ 2009-07-22 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Robert P. J. Day; +Cc: kbuild devel list
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:25:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> is it my imagination, or did someone recently propose that there
> will soon be no distinction between those two Kbuild directives since
> it's just as easy to "unifdef" all of them, no matter what? has that
> patch already been submitted for the next major release?
Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt:
--- 7.4 unifdef-y (deprecated)
unifdef-y is deprecated. A direct replacement is header-y.
That should answer your Q.
Sam
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: "header-y" versus "unifdef-y"?
2009-07-22 18:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
@ 2009-07-22 18:32 ` Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2009-07-22 18:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sam Ravnborg; +Cc: kbuild devel list
On Wed, 22 Jul 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 08:25:03AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >
> > is it my imagination, or did someone recently propose that there
> > will soon be no distinction between those two Kbuild directives since
> > it's just as easy to "unifdef" all of them, no matter what? has that
> > patch already been submitted for the next major release?
>
> Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt:
>
> --- 7.4 unifdef-y (deprecated)
>
> unifdef-y is deprecated. A direct replacement is header-y.
>
>
> That should answer your Q.
ah, quite right, thanks. i remembered someone saying that would
happen eventually, i didn't realize it had *already* happened.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
"Kernel Newbie Corner" column @ linux.com: http://cli.gs/WG6WYX
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-07-22 18:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-07-22 12:25 "header-y" versus "unifdef-y"? Robert P. J. Day
2009-07-22 18:30 ` Sam Ravnborg
2009-07-22 18:32 ` Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).