linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
	<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	KUnit Development <kunit-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v5 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 00:30:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <11549107-7247-03a7-2469-f5aa793a0d19@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNPsACW1mZmkWiCSeXfvAGaxAS5sHtYMu0-DfE7ec2pFMA@mail.gmail.com>

On 07/11/20 12:15 am, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, 6 Nov 2020 at 19:28, Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Implementation of support for parameterized testing in KUnit.
>> This approach requires the creation of a test case using the
>> KUNIT_CASE_PARAM macro that accepts a generator function as input.
>> This generator function should return the next parameter given the
>> previous parameter in parameterized tests. It also provides
>> a macro to generate common-case generators.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
>> Co-developed-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> [...]
>> -       kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case)
>> -               kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case);
>> +       kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
>> +               struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
>> +               bool test_success = true;
>> +
>> +               if (test_case->generate_params)
>> +                       test.param_value = test_case->generate_params(NULL);
>> +
>> +               do {
>> +                       kunit_run_case_catch_errors(suite, test_case, &test);
>> +                       test_success &= test_case->success;
>> +
>> +                       if (test_case->generate_params) {
>> +                               kunit_log(KERN_INFO, &test,
>> +                                       KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT
>> +                                       "# %s: param-%d %s",
>> +                                       test_case->name, test.param_index,
>> +                                       kunit_status_to_string(test.success));
> 
> Sorry, I still found something. The patch I sent had this aligned with
> the '(', whereas when I apply this patch it no longer is aligned. Why?
> 
> I see the rest of the file also aligns arguments with opening '(', so
> I think your change is inconsistent.
> 

Ah those lines had spaces instead of tab and I think I messed up the alignment
fixing that. I will send another version fixing this.
Thanks!

> Thanks,
> -- Marco
> 

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-06 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-06 18:26 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v5 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Arpitha Raghunandan
2020-11-06 18:28 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v5 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing feature Arpitha Raghunandan
2020-11-06 18:38   ` Marco Elver via Linux-kernel-mentees
2020-11-06 18:37 ` [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH v5 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Marco Elver via Linux-kernel-mentees
2020-11-06 18:45 ` Marco Elver via Linux-kernel-mentees
2020-11-06 19:00   ` Arpitha Raghunandan [this message]
2020-11-06 19:05     ` Marco Elver via Linux-kernel-mentees

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=11549107-7247-03a7-2469-f5aa793a0d19@gmail.com \
    --to=98.arpi@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=yzaikin@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).