From: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com> To: brendanhiggins@google.com, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, skhan@linuxfoundation.org Cc: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>, linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC v2 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2020 08:51:36 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20201001032136.27121-1-98.arpi@gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20200930144052.62720-1-98.arpi@gmail.com> Modifies fs/ext4/inode-test.c to use the parameterized testing feature of KUnit. Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com> --- fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c index d62d802c9c12..f127f9123cc1 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c @@ -72,6 +72,8 @@ #define UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE\ "2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on" +#define NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES 16 + struct timestamp_expectation { const char *test_case_name; struct timespec64 expected; @@ -101,7 +103,40 @@ static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test) */ static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test) { - const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = { + struct timespec64 timestamp; + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES; ++i) { + struct timestamp_expectation *test_case = (struct timestamp_expectation *)get_test_case_parameters(test); + + timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(test_case); + ext4_decode_extra_time(×tamp, + cpu_to_le32(test_case->extra_bits)); + + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_case->expected.tv_sec, + timestamp.tv_sec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_case->test_case_name, + test_case->msb_set, + test_case->lower_bound, + test_case->extra_bits); + KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, + test_case->expected.tv_nsec, + timestamp.tv_nsec, + CASE_NAME_FORMAT, + test_case->test_case_name, + test_case->msb_set, + test_case->lower_bound, + test_case->extra_bits); + } +} + +struct timestamp_expectation *get_test_parameters(void) +{ + struct timestamp_expectation *test_data = (struct timestamp_expectation *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation) * NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES, GFP_KERNEL); + + const struct timestamp_expectation test_data_init[] = { { .test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE, .msb_set = true, @@ -232,35 +267,13 @@ static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test) } }; - struct timespec64 timestamp; - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) { - timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]); - ext4_decode_extra_time(×tamp, - cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits)); + memcpy(test_data, test_data_init, sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation) * ARRAY_SIZE(test_data_init)); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, - test_data[i].expected.tv_sec, - timestamp.tv_sec, - CASE_NAME_FORMAT, - test_data[i].test_case_name, - test_data[i].msb_set, - test_data[i].lower_bound, - test_data[i].extra_bits); - KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, - test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec, - timestamp.tv_nsec, - CASE_NAME_FORMAT, - test_data[i].test_case_name, - test_data[i].msb_set, - test_data[i].lower_bound, - test_data[i].extra_bits); - } + return test_data; } static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = { - KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding), + KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding, get_test_parameters, NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES, sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation)), {} }; -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-01 3:22 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-09-30 14:40 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC v2 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Arpitha Raghunandan 2020-10-01 3:21 ` Arpitha Raghunandan [this message]
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20201001032136.27121-1-98.arpi@gmail.com \ --to=98.arpi@gmail.com \ --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \ --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \ --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \ --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \ --cc=tytso@mit.edu \ --subject='Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC v2 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).