linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
To: brendanhiggins@google.com, tytso@mit.edu,
	adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC v2 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing
Date: Thu,  1 Oct 2020 08:51:36 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201001032136.27121-1-98.arpi@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200930144052.62720-1-98.arpi@gmail.com>

Modifies fs/ext4/inode-test.c to use the parameterized testing
feature of KUnit.

Signed-off-by: Arpitha Raghunandan <98.arpi@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ext4/inode-test.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
index d62d802c9c12..f127f9123cc1 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode-test.c
@@ -72,6 +72,8 @@
 #define UPPER_BOUND_NONNEG_EXTRA_BITS_1_CASE\
 	"2446-05-10 Upper bound of 32bit >=0 timestamp. All extra sec bits on"
 
+#define NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES 16
+
 struct timestamp_expectation {
 	const char *test_case_name;
 	struct timespec64 expected;
@@ -101,7 +103,40 @@ static time64_t get_32bit_time(const struct timestamp_expectation * const test)
  */
 static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test)
 {
-	const struct timestamp_expectation test_data[] = {
+	struct timespec64 timestamp;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES; ++i) {
+		struct timestamp_expectation *test_case = (struct timestamp_expectation *)get_test_case_parameters(test);
+
+		timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(test_case);
+		ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp,
+				       cpu_to_le32(test_case->extra_bits));
+
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+				    test_case->expected.tv_sec,
+				    timestamp.tv_sec,
+				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
+				    test_case->test_case_name,
+				    test_case->msb_set,
+				    test_case->lower_bound,
+				    test_case->extra_bits);
+		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
+				    test_case->expected.tv_nsec,
+				    timestamp.tv_nsec,
+				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
+				    test_case->test_case_name,
+				    test_case->msb_set,
+				    test_case->lower_bound,
+				    test_case->extra_bits);
+	}
+}
+
+struct timestamp_expectation *get_test_parameters(void)
+{
+	struct timestamp_expectation *test_data = (struct timestamp_expectation *)kmalloc(sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation) * NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES, GFP_KERNEL);
+
+	const struct timestamp_expectation test_data_init[] = {
 		{
 			.test_case_name = LOWER_BOUND_NEG_NO_EXTRA_BITS_CASE,
 			.msb_set = true,
@@ -232,35 +267,13 @@ static void inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding(struct kunit *test)
 		}
 	};
 
-	struct timespec64 timestamp;
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(test_data); ++i) {
-		timestamp.tv_sec = get_32bit_time(&test_data[i]);
-		ext4_decode_extra_time(&timestamp,
-				       cpu_to_le32(test_data[i].extra_bits));
+	memcpy(test_data, test_data_init, sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation) * ARRAY_SIZE(test_data_init));
 
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
-				    test_data[i].expected.tv_sec,
-				    timestamp.tv_sec,
-				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
-				    test_data[i].test_case_name,
-				    test_data[i].msb_set,
-				    test_data[i].lower_bound,
-				    test_data[i].extra_bits);
-		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test,
-				    test_data[i].expected.tv_nsec,
-				    timestamp.tv_nsec,
-				    CASE_NAME_FORMAT,
-				    test_data[i].test_case_name,
-				    test_data[i].msb_set,
-				    test_data[i].lower_bound,
-				    test_data[i].extra_bits);
-	}
+	return test_data;
 }
 
 static struct kunit_case ext4_inode_test_cases[] = {
-	KUNIT_CASE(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding),
+	KUNIT_CASE_PARAM(inode_test_xtimestamp_decoding, get_test_parameters, NUMBER_OF_TESTCASES, sizeof(struct timestamp_expectation)),
 	{}
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1

_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

      reply	other threads:[~2020-10-01  3:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-30 14:40 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC v2 1/2] kunit: Support for Parameterized Testing Arpitha Raghunandan
2020-10-01  3:21 ` Arpitha Raghunandan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201001032136.27121-1-98.arpi@gmail.com \
    --to=98.arpi@gmail.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=brendanhiggins@google.com \
    --cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --subject='Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [RFC v2 2/2] fs: ext4: Modify inode-test.c to use KUnit parameterized testing' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).