linux-kernel-mentees.lists.linuxfoundation.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Anmol Karn <anmol.karan123@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
	davem@davemloft.net
Subject: Re: [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] net: rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame()
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2020 07:12:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201015051225.GA404970@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201015001712.72976-1-anmol.karan123@gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 05:47:12AM +0530, Anmol Karn wrote:
> In rose_send_frame(), when comparing two ax.25 addresses, it assigns rose_call to 
> either global ROSE callsign or default port, but when the former block triggers and 
> rose_call is assigned by (ax25_address *)neigh->dev->dev_addr, a NULL pointer is 
> dereferenced by 'neigh' when dereferencing 'dev'.
> 
> - net/rose/rose_link.c
> This bug seems to get triggered in this line:
> 
> rose_call = (ax25_address *)neigh->dev->dev_addr;
> 
> Prevent it by checking NULL condition for neigh->dev before comparing addressed for 
> rose_call initialization.
> 
> Reported-by: syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com 
> Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=9d2a7ca8c7f2e4b682c97578dfa3f236258300b3 
> Signed-off-by: Anmol Karn <anmol.karan123@gmail.com>
> ---
> I am bit sceptical about the error return code, please suggest if anything else is 
> appropriate in place of '-ENODEV'.
> 
>  net/rose/rose_link.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/net/rose/rose_link.c b/net/rose/rose_link.c
> index f6102e6f5161..92ea6a31d575 100644
> --- a/net/rose/rose_link.c
> +++ b/net/rose/rose_link.c
> @@ -97,6 +97,9 @@ static int rose_send_frame(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rose_neigh *neigh)
>  	ax25_address *rose_call;
>  	ax25_cb *ax25s;
>  
> +	if (!neigh->dev)
> +		return -ENODEV;

How can ->dev not be set at this point in time?  Shouldn't that be
fixed, because it could change right after you check this, right?

thanks,

greg k-h
_______________________________________________
Linux-kernel-mentees mailing list
Linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-kernel-mentees

  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-15  5:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-15  0:17 [Linux-kernel-mentees] [PATCH] net: rose: Fix Null pointer dereference in rose_send_frame() Anmol Karn
2020-10-15  5:12 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-10-15 14:10   ` Anmol Karn
2020-10-15 15:50     ` Greg KH
2020-10-15 18:28       ` Anmol Karn
2020-10-30 10:54       ` Anmol Karn
2020-11-01 11:02         ` Greg KH
2020-11-01 15:48           ` Anmol Karn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201015051225.GA404970@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=anmol.karan123@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=syzbot+a1c743815982d9496393@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).