linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 15:21:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210118072151.44481-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com> (raw)

Clean up that CONFIG_RETPOLINE crud and replace the
indirect call x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs with static_call().

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/core.c       | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 20 --------------------
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/core.c b/arch/x86/events/core.c
index e37de298a495..2eec3c8d0a13 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/core.c
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_swap_task_ctx, *x86_pmu.swap_task_ctx);
 DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_drain_pebs,   *x86_pmu.drain_pebs);
 DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_pebs_aliases, *x86_pmu.pebs_aliases);
 
+DEFINE_STATIC_CALL_NULL(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs,  *x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs);
+
 u64 __read_mostly hw_cache_event_ids
 				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
 				[PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
@@ -665,6 +667,18 @@ void x86_pmu_disable_all(void)
 	}
 }
 
+struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
+{
+	struct perf_guest_switch_msr *ret = NULL;
+
+	ret = static_call(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs)(nr);
+	if (!ret)
+		*nr = 0;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
+
 /*
  * There may be PMI landing after enabled=0. The PMI hitting could be before or
  * after disable_all.
@@ -1923,6 +1937,8 @@ static void x86_pmu_static_call_update(void)
 
 	static_call_update(x86_pmu_drain_pebs, x86_pmu.drain_pebs);
 	static_call_update(x86_pmu_pebs_aliases, x86_pmu.pebs_aliases);
+
+	static_call_update(x86_pmu_guest_get_msrs, x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs);
 }
 
 static void _x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index d4569bfa83e3..93adf53cce5f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -3680,26 +3680,6 @@ static int intel_pmu_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
-static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *core_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
-static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr);
-#endif
-
-struct perf_guest_switch_msr *perf_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_RETPOLINE
-	if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs == intel_guest_get_msrs)
-		return intel_guest_get_msrs(nr);
-	else if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs == core_guest_get_msrs)
-		return core_guest_get_msrs(nr);
-#endif
-	if (x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs)
-		return x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs(nr);
-	*nr = 0;
-	return NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(perf_guest_get_msrs);
-
 static struct perf_guest_switch_msr *intel_guest_get_msrs(int *nr)
 {
 	struct cpu_hw_events *cpuc = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events);
-- 
2.29.2


             reply	other threads:[~2021-01-18  7:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-18  7:21 Like Xu [this message]
2021-01-18 10:10 ` [PATCH] x86/perf: Use static_call for x86_pmu.guest_get_msrs Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-18 12:12 ` kernel test robot
2021-01-18 13:05   ` Like Xu
2021-01-18 13:35     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-01-22  3:19       ` Like Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210118072151.44481-1-like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --to=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).