[PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

[PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

[Colin Ian King]

There a couple of spelling mistakes, one in a literal string and one
in a comment. Fix them.

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c   | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
index 3fb4f69b1962..e1a937277b54 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
@@ -284,7 +284,7 @@
 	.result = ACCEPT,
 },
 {
-	"calls: not on unpriviledged",
+	"calls: not on unprivileged",
 	.insns = {
 	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2),
 	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
index 187c6f6e32bc..d37f512fad16 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
 	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
 	},
 	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1 },
-	/* The unpriviledged case is not too interesting; variable
+	/* The unprivileged case is not too interesting; variable
 	 * stack access is rejected.
 	 */
 	.errstr_unpriv = "R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root",
-- 
2.37.1

RE: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

[John Fastabend]

Colin Ian King wrote:
> There a couple of spelling mistakes, one in a literal string and one
> in a comment. Fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c   | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> index 3fb4f69b1962..e1a937277b54 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c
> @@ -284,7 +284,7 @@
>  	.result = ACCEPT,
>  },
>  {
> -	"calls: not on unpriviledged",
> +	"calls: not on unprivileged",
>  	.insns = {
>  	BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 2),
>  	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> index 187c6f6e32bc..d37f512fad16 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
>  	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
>  	},
>  	.fixup_map_hash_8b = { 1 },
> -	/* The unpriviledged case is not too interesting; variable
> +	/* The unprivileged case is not too interesting; variable
>  	 * stack access is rejected.
>  	 */
>  	.errstr_unpriv = "R2 variable stack access prohibited for !root",
> -- 
> 2.37.1
> 

Sure, but bpf-next.

Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>

Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"

[patchwork-bot+netdevbpf]

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>:

On Wed, 28 Sep 2022 23:15:55 +0100 you wrote:
> There a couple of spelling mistakes, one in a literal string and one
> in a comment. Fix them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@gmail.com>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/calls.c   | 2 +-
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/var_off.c | 2 +-
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Here is the summary with links:
  - selftests/bpf: Fix spelling mistake "unpriviledged" -> "unprivileged"
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/2efcf695bfc0

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html