linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: lpechacek@suse.com (Libor Pechacek)
Subject: [PATCH v3] selftests/livepatch: introduce tests
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2018 19:19:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180424171902.z4ymubblh2dtcp4h@fmn.suse.cz> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180424171902.N1JCURdJOTG5T5uTJz7twpkmc_U_n3Hqd8TiYYnj_XU@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c3f1a6b8-5eba-84e1-9d0b-8009c9087022@redhat.com>

On Tue 24-04-18 11:50:28, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 04/23/2018 10:43 AM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 20, 2018@02:56:05PM +0200, Libor Pechacek wrote:
> >> On Thu 12-04-18 10:54:31, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> >>> +	fi
> >>> +	echo "$ret" > /dev/kmsg
> >>> +}
> >>> +
> >>> +# unload_mod(modname) - unload a kernel module
> >>> +#	modname - module name to unload
> >>> +function unload_mod() {
> >>> +	local mod="$1"
> >>> +
> >>> +	# Wait for module reference count to clear ...
> >>> +	local i=0
> >>> +	while [[ $(cat /sys/module/"$mod"/refcnt) != "0" ]]; do
> >>> +		i=$((i+1))
> >>> +		if [[ $i -eq $MAX_RETRIES ]]; then
> >>> +			die "failed to unload module $mod (refcnt)"
> >>> +		fi
> >>> +		sleep $RETRY_INTERVAL
> >>> +	done
> >>
> >> The repeating pattern of "while <some test>; do <count>; if <count beyond max
> >> retries>; then <die>..." seems to ask for encapsulation.
> >>
> > 
> > Yeah I definitely agree.  I think at some point I had acquired
> > bash-fatigue;  I wasn't sure how to cleanly wrap <some test> around that
> > extra logic.  In C, I could do something clever with macros or a
> > callback function.  My bash scripting isn't great, so I copied and
> > pasted my way through it.  Suggestions welcome.
> > 
> 
> Okay, here's what I came up with... first off, do you prefer this kind
> of transition check vs. looking only at a specific module?
> 
>   # check_transition() - verify that no livepatch transition in effect
>   function check_transition() {
>   	grep -q '^1$' /sys/kernel/livepatch/*/transition 2>/dev/null
>   }

Elegant!

> then wrap the retry/timeout logic like:
> 
>   # retry_cmd(cmd) - loop a command until it is successful or
>   #		   $MAX_RETRIES, sleeping $RETRY_INTERVAL in
>   #		   between tries
>   # 	cmd - command and its arguments to run
>   function retry_cmd() {
>   	local cmd="$*"
>   	local i=0
>   	while eval "$cmd"; do
>   		i=$((i+1))
>   		[[ $i -eq $MAX_RETRIES ]] && return 1
>   		sleep $RETRY_INTERVAL
>   	done
>   	return 0
>   }
> 
> and the callers to something like:
> 
>   # wait_for_transition() - wait until all livepatch transitions clear
>   function wait_for_transition() {
>   	retry_cmd check_transition ||
>   		die "failed to complete transition"
>   }

My idea was to make the die() part of the retry loop. This implementation is,
however, more flexible.

> I can create similar check() functions to eval for sysfs file existence,
> file content, reference count, etc. to remove all the other
> retry/timeout loops.

I think check_*() functions can be avoided for trivial tests. retry_cmd() can
be passed a more complex command string than a single function name.

Regarding naming, I'd say wait_false() or similar would better describe what
retry_cmd() does. 

Libor
-- 
Libor Pechacek
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-24 17:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-12 14:54 [PATCH v3] Add livepatch kselftests joe.lawrence
2018-04-12 14:54 ` Joe Lawrence
2018-04-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v3] selftests/livepatch: introduce tests joe.lawrence
2018-04-12 14:54   ` Joe Lawrence
2018-04-12 21:36   ` jpoimboe
2018-04-12 21:36     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-04-13 11:20   ` mbenes
2018-04-13 11:20     ` Miroslav Benes
2018-04-13 20:52     ` joe.lawrence
2018-04-13 20:52       ` Joe Lawrence
2018-04-16 11:33       ` mbenes
2018-04-16 11:33         ` Miroslav Benes
2018-04-16 15:02         ` pmladek
2018-04-16 15:02           ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-17  8:06           ` mbenes
2018-04-17  8:06             ` Miroslav Benes
2018-04-17 13:25             ` joe.lawrence
2018-04-17 13:25               ` Joe Lawrence
2018-04-16 12:49   ` pmladek
2018-04-16 12:49     ` Petr Mladek
2018-04-20 12:56   ` lpechacek
2018-04-20 12:56     ` Libor Pechacek
2018-04-23 14:43     ` joe.lawrence
2018-04-23 14:43       ` Joe Lawrence
2018-04-24 15:50       ` joe.lawrence
2018-04-24 15:50         ` Joe Lawrence
2018-04-24 17:19         ` lpechacek [this message]
2018-04-24 17:19           ` Libor Pechacek
2018-04-24 17:35       ` lpechacek
2018-04-24 17:35         ` Libor Pechacek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180424171902.z4ymubblh2dtcp4h@fmn.suse.cz \
    --to=lpechacek@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).