linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mhiramat at kernel.org (Masami Hiramatsu)
Subject: [PATCH v7 00/16] tracing: probeevent: Improve fetcharg features
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 13:01:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180508130127.c9de04e9d9c93a90e9891ae0@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180507113003.66045d18@gandalf.local.home>

On Mon, 7 May 2018 11:30:03 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 6 May 2018 00:51:43 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > OK, now I think it is a time to introduce new unified interface for dynamic events,
> > tracefs/dynamic_events and make uprobe_events and kprobe_events as symbolic-links
> > to the new interface file.
> 
> So basically make one file that does all the work?
> 
> I'm not sure we can keep the other files as symbolic links. Because we
> don't want the kprobe_events showing up in the uprobe_events file, and
> vice versa. We need to keep all this backward compatible.

Good catch!
Can't we check which file the user opened? If not, even though
we can setup a filter in ops->open().

> 
> But I do like the idea of one file to rule them all, approach.

Thanks!

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > 
> > Actually, there is no reason we split those 2 interfaces, since
> > both have similar, but very clear syntax differences.
> > 
> > o Uprobe event definition
> >   p[:[GRP/]EVENT] PATH:OFFSET [FETCHARGS] : Set a uprobe
> >   r[:[GRP/]EVENT] PATH:OFFSET [FETCHARGS] : Set a return uprobe (uretprobe)
> >   -:[GRP/]EVENT                           : Clear uprobe or uretprobe event
> > 
> > o Kprobe event definition
> >   p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+offs]|MEMADDR [FETCHARGS]  : Set a probe
> >   r[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]  : Set a return probe
> >   -:[GRP/]EVENT                                         : Clear a probe
> > 
> > At first, it is clear that those can share the parser. 2nd, it is easy to
> > distinguish those, because Uprobe event must require the PATH which starts
> > with '/', on the other hand, Kprobe event must NOT start with '/'.
> > (both SYM and MOD will start with alphabet or '_', of course MEMADDR
> > will start with digits)
> > 
> > If we can merge those to unified dynamic_events interface, I think
> > 'f[:[GRP/]EVENT] SYM(CAST)' is also acceptable, since it is no more
> > only for kprobe/uprobe. We can directly add some other dynamic
> > events via dynamic_events interface. ;)
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: mhiramat@kernel.org (Masami Hiramatsu)
Subject: [PATCH v7 00/16] tracing: probeevent: Improve fetcharg features
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 13:01:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180508130127.c9de04e9d9c93a90e9891ae0@kernel.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20180508040127.TFHdigcCWTYX1rbjgX09lkzAEPX4x3hBsnxzSaP8EHw@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180507113003.66045d18@gandalf.local.home>

On Mon, 7 May 2018 11:30:03 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 6 May 2018 00:51:43 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > OK, now I think it is a time to introduce new unified interface for dynamic events,
> > tracefs/dynamic_events and make uprobe_events and kprobe_events as symbolic-links
> > to the new interface file.
> 
> So basically make one file that does all the work?
> 
> I'm not sure we can keep the other files as symbolic links. Because we
> don't want the kprobe_events showing up in the uprobe_events file, and
> vice versa. We need to keep all this backward compatible.

Good catch!
Can't we check which file the user opened? If not, even though
we can setup a filter in ops->open().

> 
> But I do like the idea of one file to rule them all, approach.

Thanks!

> 
> -- Steve
> 
> 
> > 
> > Actually, there is no reason we split those 2 interfaces, since
> > both have similar, but very clear syntax differences.
> > 
> > o Uprobe event definition
> >   p[:[GRP/]EVENT] PATH:OFFSET [FETCHARGS] : Set a uprobe
> >   r[:[GRP/]EVENT] PATH:OFFSET [FETCHARGS] : Set a return uprobe (uretprobe)
> >   -:[GRP/]EVENT                           : Clear uprobe or uretprobe event
> > 
> > o Kprobe event definition
> >   p[:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+offs]|MEMADDR [FETCHARGS]  : Set a probe
> >   r[MAXACTIVE][:[GRP/]EVENT] [MOD:]SYM[+0] [FETCHARGS]  : Set a return probe
> >   -:[GRP/]EVENT                                         : Clear a probe
> > 
> > At first, it is clear that those can share the parser. 2nd, it is easy to
> > distinguish those, because Uprobe event must require the PATH which starts
> > with '/', on the other hand, Kprobe event must NOT start with '/'.
> > (both SYM and MOD will start with alphabet or '_', of course MEMADDR
> > will start with digits)
> > 
> > If we can merge those to unified dynamic_events interface, I think
> > 'f[:[GRP/]EVENT] SYM(CAST)' is also acceptable, since it is no more
> > only for kprobe/uprobe. We can directly add some other dynamic
> > events via dynamic_events interface. ;)
> > 
> > Thank you,
> > 
> 


-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat at kernel.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kselftest" in
the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-05-08  4:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-25 12:16 [PATCH v7 00/16] tracing: probeevent: Improve fetcharg features mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:16 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:16 ` [PATCH v7 01/16] tracing: probeevent: Cleanup print argument functions mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:16   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 02/16] tracing: probeevent: Cleanup argument field definition mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:17   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:17 ` [PATCH v7 03/16] tracing: probeevent: Remove NOKPROBE_SYMBOL from print functions mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:17   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 04/16] tracing: probeevent: Introduce new argument fetching code mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:18   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v7 05/16] tracing: probeevent: Unify fetch type tables mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:18   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 06/16] tracing: probeevent: Return consumed bytes of dynamic area mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:19   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 07/16] tracing: probeevent: Append traceprobe_ for exported function mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:19   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:19 ` [PATCH v7 08/16] tracing: probeevent: Unify fetch_insn processing common part mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:19   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:20 ` [PATCH v7 09/16] tracing: probeevent: Add symbol type mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:20   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:20 ` [PATCH v7 10/16] x86: ptrace: Add function argument access API mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:20   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:21 ` [PATCH v7 11/16] tracing: probeevent: Add $argN for accessing function args mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:21   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:21 ` [PATCH v7 12/16] tracing: probeevent: Add array type support mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:21   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:22 ` [PATCH v7 13/16] selftests: ftrace: Add a testcase for symbol type mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:22   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:22 ` [PATCH v7 14/16] selftests: ftrace: Add a testcase for $argN with kprobe_event mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:22   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:23 ` [PATCH v7 15/16] selftests: ftrace: Add a testcase for array type " mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:23   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-25 12:23 ` [PATCH v7 16/16] perf-probe: Add array argument support mhiramat
2018-04-25 12:23   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-04-27  1:42 ` [PATCH v7 00/16] tracing: probeevent: Improve fetcharg features rostedt
2018-04-27  1:42   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-03 22:11 ` rostedt
2018-05-03 22:11   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-04 15:48   ` mhiramat
2018-05-04 15:48     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-04 16:06     ` rostedt
2018-05-04 16:06       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-04 17:30       ` naveen.n.rao
2018-05-04 17:30         ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-05-05  2:38       ` mhiramat
2018-05-05  2:38         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-05  7:46         ` naveen.n.rao
2018-05-05  7:46           ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-05-05 14:32           ` mhiramat
2018-05-05 14:32             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-07  8:11             ` naveen.n.rao
2018-05-07  8:11               ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-05-07 14:53               ` mhiramat
2018-05-07 14:53                 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-08 10:11                 ` naveen.n.rao
2018-05-08 10:11                   ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-05-08 15:02                   ` mhiramat
2018-05-08 15:02                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-08 18:01                     ` naveen.n.rao
2018-05-08 18:01                       ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-05-05 15:51         ` mhiramat
2018-05-05 15:51           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-07 15:30           ` rostedt
2018-05-07 15:30             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-05-08  4:01             ` mhiramat [this message]
2018-05-08  4:01               ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-05-07 15:21         ` rostedt
2018-05-07 15:21           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-21 20:16 ` rostedt
2018-06-21 20:16   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-22  6:04   ` mhiramat
2018-06-22  6:04     ` Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180508130127.c9de04e9d9c93a90e9891ae0@kernel.org \
    --to=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).