Linux-kselftest Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / Atom feed
From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
To: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/11] kselftest: arm64: adds first test and common utils
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2019 12:16:35 +0100
Message-ID: <20190809111635.GL10425@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20278fdd-95d0-060f-088d-aba8ac2b0b01@arm.com>

On Fri, Aug 09, 2019 at 11:54:06AM +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On 8/2/19 6:02 PM, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> >Added some arm64/signal specific boilerplate and utility code to help
> >further testcase development.
> >
> >A simple testcase and related helpers are also introduced in this commit:
> >mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle is a simple mangle testcase which
> >messes with the ucontext_t from within the sig_handler, trying to toggle
> >PSTATE state bits to switch the system between 32bit/64bit execution state.
> >Expects SIGSEGV on test PASS.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
> >---
> >A few fixes:
> >- test_arm64_signals.sh runner script generation has been reviewed in order to
> >   be safe against the .gitignore
> >- using kselftest.h officially provided defines for tests' return values
> >- removed SAFE_WRITE()/dump_uc()
> >- looking for si_code==SEGV_ACCERR on SEGV test cases to better understand if
> >   the sigfault had been directly triggered by Kernel
> >---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/Makefile        |   2 +-
> >  .../testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore |   6 +
> >  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile |  88 ++++++
> >  tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/README   |  59 ++++
> >  .../arm64/signal/test_arm64_signals.src_shell |  55 ++++
> >  .../selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.c     |  26 ++
> >  .../selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h     | 137 +++++++++
> >  .../arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c         | 261 ++++++++++++++++++
> >  .../arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h         |  13 +
> >  .../arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore         |   1 +
> >  .../mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle.c     |  25 ++
> >  .../arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c        | 150 ++++++++++
> >  .../arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.h        |  83 ++++++
> >  13 files changed, 905 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/.gitignore
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/Makefile
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/README
> >  create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_arm64_signals.src_shell
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals.h
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.h
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/.gitignore
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/testcases/testcases.h
> >
> 
> A few more compilation warnings triggered by GCC-8 ONLY when compiling via the top kselftest Makefile/target
> (due to some additional -W passed down and an awkward use of snprintf on my side...)
> 
> 
> test_signals_utils.c: In function ‘feats_to_string’:
> test_signals_utils.c:38:13: warning: passing argument 1 to restrict-qualified parameter aliases with argument 4 [-Wrestrict]
>     snprintf(feats_string, MAX_FEATS_SZ - 1, "%s %s ",
>              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> test_signals_utils.c: In function ‘default_handler’:
> test_signals_utils.c:192:19: warning: format ‘%p’ expects argument of type ‘void *’, but argument 3 has type ‘long long unsigned int’ [-Wformat=]
>     "SIG_OK -- SP:%p  si_addr@:0x%p  si_code:%d  token@:0x%p  offset:%ld\n",
>                   ~^
> 
> will be fixed in V4 as:
> 
> 
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> index 31788a1d33a4..c0f3cd1b560a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/signal/test_signals_utils.c
> @@ -23,21 +23,25 @@ extern struct tdescr *current;
>  static int sig_copyctx = SIGTRAP;
>  static char *feats_store[FMAX_END] = {
> -       "SSBS",
> -       "PAN",
> -       "UAO",
> +       " SSBS ",
> +       " PAN ",
> +       " UAO ",
>  };
>  #define MAX_FEATS_SZ   128
> +static char feats_string[MAX_FEATS_SZ];
> +
>  static inline char *feats_to_string(unsigned long feats)
>  {
> -       static char feats_string[MAX_FEATS_SZ];
> +       for (int i = 0; i < FMAX_END; i++) {
> +               size_t tlen = 0;
> -       for (int i = 0; i < FMAX_END && feats_store[i][0]; i++) {
> -               if (feats & 1UL << i)
> -                       snprintf(feats_string, MAX_FEATS_SZ - 1, "%s %s ",
> -                                feats_string, feats_store[i]);
> +               if (feats & 1UL << i) {
> +                       strncat(feats_string, feats_store[i],

Should this be feats_string + tlen?

> +                               MAX_FEATS_SZ - 1 - tlen);

An assert(tlen <= MAX_FEATS_SZ - 1) is probably a good idea here,
in case more features are added to feats_store[] someday.

> +                       tlen += strlen(feats_store[i]);
> +               }

Don't we need to initialise tlen outside the loop?  Otherwise we just
zero it again after the +=.

>         }
>         return feats_string;
> @@ -190,7 +194,7 @@ static void default_handler(int signum, siginfo_t *si, void *uc)
>                 /* it's a bug in the test code when this assert fail */
>                 assert(!current->sig_trig || current->triggered);
>                 fprintf(stderr,
> -                       "SIG_OK -- SP:%p  si_addr@:0x%p  si_code:%d  token@:0x%p  offset:%ld\n",
> +                       "SIG_OK -- SP:%llX  si_addr@:0x%p  si_code:%d  token@:0x%p  offset:%ld\n",

For consistency, can we have a "0x" prefix?

I think %p usually generates a "0x" prefix by itself, so 0x%p might give
a double prefix.

[...]

Cheers
---Dave

  reply index

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-02 17:02 [PATCH v3 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] kselftest: arm64: introduce new boilerplate code Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:23   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-27 12:14     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] kselftest: arm64: adds first test and common utils Cristian Marussi
2019-08-06 15:50   ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 15:42   ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 10:54   ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 11:16     ` Dave Martin [this message]
2019-08-09 12:20       ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-09 12:32         ` Dave Martin
2019-08-12 12:43   ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-13 13:22     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-14 10:22       ` Amit Kachhap
2019-08-27 14:24         ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-28 17:34     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-03 15:34       ` Dave Martin
2019-09-03 16:08         ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_daif_bits Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 10:19     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_mode_el Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:24   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 11:50     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_ssbs_regs Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-29 15:35     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_magic Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:29     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 10:05       ` Dave Martin
2019-09-04 10:37         ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-04 10:47           ` Dave Martin
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size_for_magic0 Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:25   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:49     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_missing_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 14:55     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_duplicated_fpsimd Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:11     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:02 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_bad_size Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:26   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:21     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-02 17:03 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] kselftest: arm64: fake_sigreturn_misaligned_sp Cristian Marussi
2019-08-07 16:04   ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:28     ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 15:22       ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:27   ` Dave Martin
2019-08-30 16:33     ` Cristian Marussi
2019-08-13 16:22 ` [PATCH v3 00/11] Add arm64/signal initial kselftest support Dave Martin
2019-08-30 16:40   ` Cristian Marussi
2019-09-02 10:53     ` Dave Martin
2019-09-02 11:30       ` Cristian Marussi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publically to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190809111635.GL10425@arm.com \
    --to=dave.martin@arm.com \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Linux-kselftest Archive on lore.kernel.org

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest/0 linux-kselftest/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 linux-kselftest linux-kselftest/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kselftest \
		linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
	public-inbox-index linux-kselftest

Example config snippet for mirrors

Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://nntp.lore.kernel.org/org.kernel.vger.linux-kselftest


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/public-inbox.git