[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 19/94] selftests/bpf: fix "bind{4, 6} deny specific IP & port" on s390

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 19/94] selftests/bpf: fix "bind{4, 6} deny specific IP & port" on s390

[Sasha Levin]

From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 27df5c7068bf23cab282dc64b1c9894429b3b8a0 ]

"bind4 allow specific IP & port" and "bind6 deny specific IP & port"
fail on s390 because of endianness issue: the 4 IP address bytes are
loaded as a word and compared with a constant, but the value of this
constant should be different on big- and little- endian machines, which
is not the case right now.

Use __bpf_constant_ntohl to generate proper value based on machine
endianness.

Fixes: 1d436885b23b ("selftests/bpf: Selftest for sys_bind post-hooks.")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
index fb679ac3d4b07..0e66527334623 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_sock.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 #include <bpf/bpf.h>
 
 #include "cgroup_helpers.h"
+#include "bpf_endian.h"
 #include "bpf_rlimit.h"
 #include "bpf_util.h"
 
@@ -232,7 +233,8 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 			/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
 			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
 				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip6[3])),
-			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x01000000, 4),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+				    __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x00000001), 4),
 			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
 				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
 			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x2001, 2),
@@ -261,7 +263,8 @@ static struct sock_test tests[] = {
 			/* if (ip == expected && port == expected) */
 			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
 				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4)),
-			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x0100007F, 4),
+			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7,
+				    __bpf_constant_ntohl(0x7F000001), 4),
 			BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_6,
 				    offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_port)),
 			BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_7, 0x1002, 2),
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 31/94] selftests/bpf: fix test_cgroup_storage on s390

[Sasha Levin]

From: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 806ce6e2117a42528e7bb979e04e28229b34a612 ]

test_cgroup_storage fails on s390 with an assertion failure: packets are
dropped when they shouldn't. The problem is that BPF_DW packet count is
accessed as BPF_W with an offset of 0, which is not correct on
big-endian machines.

Since the point of this test is not to verify narrow loads/stores,
simply use BPF_DW when working with packet counts.

Fixes: 68cfa3ac6b8d ("selftests/bpf: add a cgroup storage test")
Fixes: 919646d2a3a9 ("selftests/bpf: extend the storage test to test per-cpu cgroup storage")
Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
index 2fc4625c1a150..6557290043911 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_cgroup_storage.c
@@ -20,9 +20,9 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* flags, not used */
 		BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0,
 			     BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage),
-		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_0, 0),
 		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_3, 0x1),
-		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
+		BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 0),
 
 		BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0), /* map fd */
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 0), /* flags, not used */
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
 			     BPF_FUNC_get_local_storage),
 		BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 1),
 		BPF_STX_XADD(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
-		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
+		BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0, 0),
 		BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_1, 0x1),
 		BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1),
 		BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 32/94] selftests/bpf: add config fragment BPF_JIT

[Sasha Levin]

From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>

[ Upstream commit 0604409df9e04cdec7b08d471c8c1c0c10b5554d ]

When running test_kmod.sh the following shows up

 # sysctl cannot stat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable No such file or directory
 cannot: stat_/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable #
 # sysctl cannot stat /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden No such file or directory
 cannot: stat_/proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_harden #

Rework to enable CONFIG_BPF_JIT to solve "No such file or directory"

Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
index f7a0744db31e1..5dc109f4c0970 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config
@@ -34,3 +34,4 @@ CONFIG_NET_MPLS_GSO=m
 CONFIG_MPLS_ROUTING=m
 CONFIG_MPLS_IPTUNNEL=m
 CONFIG_IPV6_SIT=m
+CONFIG_BPF_JIT=y
-- 
2.20.1

[PATCH AUTOSEL 5.2 33/94] selftests/bpf: install files test_xdp_vlan.sh

[Sasha Levin]

From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>

[ Upstream commit 3035bb72ee47d494c041465b4add9c6407c832ed ]

When ./test_xdp_vlan_mode_generic.sh runs it complains that it can't
find file test_xdp_vlan.sh.

 # selftests: bpf: test_xdp_vlan_mode_generic.sh
 # ./test_xdp_vlan_mode_generic.sh: line 9: ./test_xdp_vlan.sh: No such
 file or directory

Rework so that test_xdp_vlan.sh gets installed, added to the variable
TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED.

Fixes: d35661fcf95d ("selftests/bpf: add wrapper scripts for test_xdp_vlan.sh")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <jbrouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index b9e88ccc289ba..adced69d026e5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -61,7 +61,8 @@ TEST_PROGS := test_kmod.sh \
 TEST_PROGS_EXTENDED := with_addr.sh \
 	with_tunnels.sh \
 	tcp_client.py \
-	tcp_server.py
+	tcp_server.py \
+	test_xdp_vlan.sh
 
 # Compile but not part of 'make run_tests'
 TEST_GEN_PROGS_EXTENDED = test_libbpf_open test_sock_addr test_skb_cgroup_id_user \
-- 
2.20.1