[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 033/209] selftests/tls: Fix recv(MSG_PEEK) & splice() test cases

* [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 033/209] selftests/tls: Fix recv(MSG_PEEK) & splice() test cases
       [not found] <20191113015025.9685-1-sashal@kernel.org>
@ 2019-11-13  1:47 ` Sasha Levin
  2019-11-13  1:49 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 124/209] tc-testing: fix build of eBPF programs Sasha Levin
  2019-11-13  1:50 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 193/209] selftests: forwarding: Have lldpad_app_wait_set() wait for unknown, too Sasha Levin
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sasha Levin @ 2019-11-13  1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, stable
  Cc: Vakul Garg, David S . Miller, Sasha Levin, netdev, linux-kselftest

From: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@nxp.com>

[ Upstream commit 0ed3015c9964dab7a1693b3e40650f329c16691e ]

TLS test cases splice_from_pipe, send_and_splice &
recv_peek_multiple_records expect to receive a given nummber of bytes
and then compare them against the number of bytes which were sent.
Therefore, system call recv() must not return before receiving the
requested number of bytes, otherwise the subsequent memcmp() fails.
This patch passes MSG_WAITALL flag to recv() so that it does not return
prematurely before requested number of bytes are copied to receive
buffer.

Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 20 ++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
index 8fdfeafaf8c00..7549d39ccafff 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ TEST_F(tls, splice_from_pipe)
 	ASSERT_GE(pipe(p), 0);
 	EXPECT_GE(write(p[1], mem_send, send_len), 0);
 	EXPECT_GE(splice(p[0], NULL, self->fd, NULL, send_len, 0), 0);
-	EXPECT_GE(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, 0), 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, MSG_WAITALL), send_len);
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(mem_send, mem_recv, send_len), 0);
 }
 
@@ -322,13 +322,13 @@ TEST_F(tls, send_and_splice)
 
 	ASSERT_GE(pipe(p), 0);
 	EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, test_str, send_len2, 0), send_len2);
-	EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len2, 0), -1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len2, MSG_WAITALL), send_len2);
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str, buf, send_len2), 0);
 
 	EXPECT_GE(write(p[1], mem_send, send_len), send_len);
 	EXPECT_GE(splice(p[0], NULL, self->fd, NULL, send_len, 0), send_len);
 
-	EXPECT_GE(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, 0), 0);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, mem_recv, send_len, MSG_WAITALL), send_len);
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(mem_send, mem_recv, send_len), 0);
 }
 
@@ -516,17 +516,17 @@ TEST_F(tls, recv_peek_multiple_records)
 	len = strlen(test_str_second) + 1;
 	EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, test_str_second, len, 0), len);
 
-	len = sizeof(buf);
+	len = strlen(test_str_first);
 	memset(buf, 0, len);
-	EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_PEEK), -1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL), len);
 
 	/* MSG_PEEK can only peek into the current record. */
-	len = strlen(test_str_first) + 1;
+	len = strlen(test_str_first);
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str_first, buf, len), 0);
 
-	len = sizeof(buf);
+	len = strlen(test_str) + 1;
 	memset(buf, 0, len);
-	EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, 0), -1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_WAITALL), len);
 
 	/* Non-MSG_PEEK will advance strparser (and therefore record)
 	 * however.
@@ -543,9 +543,9 @@ TEST_F(tls, recv_peek_multiple_records)
 	len = strlen(test_str_second) + 1;
 	EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, test_str_second, len, 0), len);
 
-	len = sizeof(buf);
+	len = strlen(test_str) + 1;
 	memset(buf, 0, len);
-	EXPECT_NE(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_PEEK), -1);
+	EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, len, MSG_PEEK | MSG_WAITALL), len);
 
 	len = strlen(test_str) + 1;
 	EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(test_str, buf, len), 0);
-- 
2.20.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread