linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Edward Liaw <edliaw@google.com>,
	Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/timers/posix_timers: reimplement check_timer_distribution()
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2024 17:50:53 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240411155053.GD5494@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87il0o0yrc.ffs@tglx>

On 04/11, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 11 2024 at 13:44, Mark Brown wrote:
> >
> > Further to my previous mail it's also broken the arm64 selftest builds,
> > they use kselftest.h with nolibc in order to test low level
> > functionality mainly used by libc implementations and nolibc doesn't
> > implement uname():
> >
> > In file included from za-fork.c:12:
> > ../../kselftest.h:433:17: error: variable has incomplete type 'struct utsname'
> >         struct utsname info;
> >                        ^
> > ../../kselftest.h:433:9: note: forward declaration of 'struct utsname'
> >         struct utsname info;
> >                ^
> > ../../kselftest.h:435:6: error: call to undeclared function 'uname'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >         if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2)
> >             ^
> > ../../kselftest.h:435:22: error: call to undeclared function 'sscanf'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> >         if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2)
>
> Grrr. Let me stare at this.

Damn ;)

Can't we just turn ksft_min_kernel_version() into

	static inline int ksft_min_kernel_version(unsigned int min_major,
						  unsigned int min_minor)
	{
	#ifdef NOLIBC
		return -1;
	#else
		unsigned int major, minor;
		struct utsname info;

		if (uname(&info) || sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2)
		       ksft_exit_fail_msg("Can't parse kernel version\n");

		return major > min_major || (major == min_major && minor >= min_minor);
	#endif
	}

?

Not sure what should check_timer_distribution() do in this case, to me
ksft_test_result_fail() is fine.

Oleg.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-11 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16 12:30 [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Marco Elver
2023-03-16 12:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] selftests/timers/posix_timers: Test delivery of signals across threads Marco Elver
2024-04-06 20:53   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-06 21:13     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 21:32       ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-03-30 10:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Marco Elver
2023-04-06 14:12 ` Marco Elver
2023-04-06 15:13   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-06 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-01 20:17 ` John Stultz
2024-04-02  9:07   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-02 14:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-02 17:23     ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 12:41       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 15:03         ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-03 15:43           ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 16:32             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 18:16               ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 19:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 19:35                   ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 22:24                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 14:54                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-04 18:08                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-06 15:09                           ` [PATCH] selftests/timers/posix_timers: reimplement check_timer_distribution() Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 15:10                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 22:00                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08  8:30                               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-08 10:01                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08 10:26                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-08 18:49                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-08 22:17                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-09 11:10                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-09 11:45                                         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-09 12:02                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-09 13:38                                           ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-10 22:21                                             ` John Stultz
2024-04-10 22:31                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 22:33                                                 ` John Stultz
2024-04-11 12:41                             ` [PATCH] " Mark Brown
2024-04-11 15:33                               ` John Stultz
2024-04-11 12:44                             ` Mark Brown
2024-04-11 14:17                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 15:50                                 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2024-04-11 16:03                                   ` Mark Brown
2024-04-12 12:35                               ` [PATCH] selftests: fix build failure with NOLIBC Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-14  7:42                                 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-04  8:55             ` [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-04 13:43               ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-04 15:10                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 15:23                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-05  4:28                 ` Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240411155053.GD5494@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=edliaw@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).