linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>, Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Edward Liaw <edliaw@google.com>,
	Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/timers/posix_timers: reimplement check_timer_distribution()
Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 00:17:15 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87il0r7b4k.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240408184957.GD25058@redhat.com>

On Mon, Apr 08 2024 at 20:49, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> To me this test should simply do
>
> 	ksft_test_result(!ctd_failed, "check signal distribution\n");
> 	return 0;

Right.

> but I am not familiar with tools/testing/selftests/ and I am not sure
> I understand the last email from Thomas.

The discussion started about running new tests on older kernels. As this
is a feature and not a bug fix that obviously fails on older kernels.

So something like the uncompiled below should work.

Thanks,

        tglx
---
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/timers/posix_timers.c
@@ -184,80 +184,83 @@ static int check_timer_create(int which)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int remain;
-__thread int got_signal;
+static pthread_t ctd_thread;
+static volatile int ctd_count, ctd_failed;
 
-static void *distribution_thread(void *arg)
+static void ctd_sighandler(int sig)
 {
-	while (__atomic_load_n(&remain, __ATOMIC_RELAXED));
-	return NULL;
-}
-
-static void distribution_handler(int nr)
-{
-	if (!__atomic_exchange_n(&got_signal, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED))
-		__atomic_fetch_sub(&remain, 1, __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
+	if (pthread_self() != ctd_thread)
+		ctd_failed = 1;
+	ctd_count--;
 }
 
-/*
- * Test that all running threads _eventually_ receive CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID
- * timer signals. This primarily tests that the kernel does not favour any one.
- */
-static int check_timer_distribution(void)
+static void *ctd_thread_func(void *arg)
 {
-	int err, i;
-	timer_t id;
-	const int nthreads = 10;
-	pthread_t threads[nthreads];
 	struct itimerspec val = {
 		.it_value.tv_sec = 0,
 		.it_value.tv_nsec = 1000 * 1000,
 		.it_interval.tv_sec = 0,
 		.it_interval.tv_nsec = 1000 * 1000,
 	};
+	timer_t id;
 
-	remain = nthreads + 1;  /* worker threads + this thread */
-	signal(SIGALRM, distribution_handler);
-	err = timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id);
-	if (err < 0) {
-		ksft_perror("Can't create timer");
-		return -1;
-	}
-	err = timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL);
-	if (err < 0) {
-		ksft_perror("Can't set timer");
-		return -1;
-	}
+	/* 1/10 seconds to ensure the leader sleeps */
+	usleep(10000);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) {
-		err = pthread_create(&threads[i], NULL, distribution_thread,
-				     NULL);
-		if (err) {
-			ksft_print_msg("Can't create thread: %s (%d)\n",
-				       strerror(errno), errno);
-			return -1;
-		}
-	}
+	ctd_count = 100;
+	if (timer_create(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, NULL, &id))
+		return "Can't create timer";
+	if (timer_settime(id, 0, &val, NULL))
+		return "Can't set timer";
 
-	/* Wait for all threads to receive the signal. */
-	while (__atomic_load_n(&remain, __ATOMIC_RELAXED));
+	while (ctd_count > 0 && !ctd_failed)
+		;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nthreads; i++) {
-		err = pthread_join(threads[i], NULL);
-		if (err) {
-			ksft_print_msg("Can't join thread: %s (%d)\n",
-				       strerror(errno), errno);
-			return -1;
-		}
-	}
+	if (timer_delete(id))
+		return "Can't delete timer";
 
-	if (timer_delete(id)) {
-		ksft_perror("Can't delete timer");
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static bool check_kernel_version(unsigned int min_major, unsigned int min_minor)
+{
+	unsigned int major, minor;
+	struct utsname info;
+
+	uname(&info);
+	if (sscanf(info.release, "%u.%u.", &major, &minor) != 2)
+		ksft_exit_fail();
+	return major > min_major || (major == min_major && minor >= min_minor);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Test that only the running thread receives the timer signal.
+ */
+static int check_timer_distribution(void)
+{
+	const char *errmsg;
+
+	if (!check_kernel_version(6, 3)) {
+		ksft_test_result_skip("check signal distribution (old kernel)\n");
 		return 0;
 	}
 
-	ksft_test_result_pass("check_timer_distribution\n");
+	signal(SIGALRM, ctd_sighandler);
+
+	errmsg = "Can't create thread";
+	if (pthread_create(&ctd_thread, NULL, ctd_thread_func, NULL))
+		goto err;
+
+	errmsg = "Can't join thread";
+	if (pthread_join(ctd_thread, (void **)&errmsg) || errmsg)
+		goto err;
+
+	ksft_test_result(!ctd_failed, "check signal distribution\n");
 	return 0;
+
+err:
+	ksft_print_msg(errmsg);
+	return -1;
 }
 
 int main(int argc, char **argv)

  reply	other threads:[~2024-04-08 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-16 12:30 [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Marco Elver
2023-03-16 12:30 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] selftests/timers/posix_timers: Test delivery of signals across threads Marco Elver
2024-04-06 20:53   ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2024-04-06 21:13     ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 21:32       ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2023-03-30 10:19 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Marco Elver
2023-04-06 14:12 ` Marco Elver
2023-04-06 15:13   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-06 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-04-01 20:17 ` John Stultz
2024-04-02  9:07   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-02 14:57   ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-02 17:23     ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 12:41       ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 15:03         ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-03 15:43           ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 16:32             ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 18:16               ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 19:09                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-03 19:35                   ` John Stultz
2024-04-03 22:24                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 14:54                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-04 18:08                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-06 15:09                           ` [PATCH] selftests/timers/posix_timers: reimplement check_timer_distribution() Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 15:10                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-06 22:00                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08  8:30                               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-08 10:01                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08 10:26                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-08 18:49                                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-08 22:17                                     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-04-09 11:10                                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-09 11:45                                         ` Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-09 12:02                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-09 13:38                                           ` [PATCH v2] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-10 22:21                                             ` John Stultz
2024-04-10 22:31                                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 22:33                                                 ` John Stultz
2024-04-11 12:41                             ` [PATCH] " Mark Brown
2024-04-11 15:33                               ` John Stultz
2024-04-11 12:44                             ` Mark Brown
2024-04-11 14:17                               ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 15:50                                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-11 16:03                                   ` Mark Brown
2024-04-12 12:35                               ` [PATCH] selftests: fix build failure with NOLIBC Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-14  7:42                                 ` Mark Brown
2024-04-04  8:55             ` [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread Dmitry Vyukov
2024-04-04 13:43               ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-04 15:10                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 15:23                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-04-05  4:28                 ` Dmitry Vyukov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87il0r7b4k.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=cmllamas@google.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=edliaw@google.com \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).