From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] selftests/resctrl: Return KSFT_SKIP(4) if resctrl filessystem is not supported or resctrl is not run as root
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2021 11:27:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b9ed425-cadb-15df-4c4f-eb1dc0b814dd@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211110093315.3219191-3-tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Hi Shaopeng Tan,
(subject line and commit message: filessystem -> file system)
On 11/10/2021 1:33 AM, Shaopeng Tan wrote:
> From: "Tan, Shaopeng" <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
>
> To unify the return code of resctrl_tests with the return code of
> selftest set, return KSFT_SKIP (4) if resctrl filessystem is not
> supported or resctrl is not run as root.
Could you please elaborate how changing ksft_exit_fail_msg() to
ksft_exit_skip() accomplishes the goal of unifying the return code?
What is wrong with using ksft_exit_fail_msg()?
Reinette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-29 19:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-10 9:33 [PATCH 0/3] selftests/resctrl: Add resctrl_tests into kselftest set Shaopeng Tan
2021-11-10 9:33 ` [PATCH 1/3] selftests/resctrl: Make resctrl_tests run using kselftest framework Shaopeng Tan
2021-11-29 19:27 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-12-01 2:36 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-12-02 0:18 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-12-03 7:21 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-12-03 23:08 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-12-06 6:57 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-12-06 15:23 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-11-10 9:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] selftests/resctrl: Return KSFT_SKIP(4) if resctrl filessystem is not supported or resctrl is not run as root Shaopeng Tan
2021-11-29 19:27 ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2021-12-01 2:36 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-12-02 0:39 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-11-10 9:33 ` [PATCH 3/3] selftests/resctrl: Kill the child process created by fork() when the SIGTERM signal comes Shaopeng Tan
2021-11-24 11:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] selftests/resctrl: Add resctrl_tests into kselftest set tan.shaopeng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b9ed425-cadb-15df-4c4f-eb1dc0b814dd@intel.com \
--to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).