From: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>,
Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Steve Muckle <smuckle@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] kunit: Support redirecting function calls
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2022 16:13:22 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAFd5g461Poh37o=3m6EXppdX7oS0D5vZxvFAEtzJMwtBD1VJEw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220318092159.6f275782@gandalf.local.home>
On Fri, Mar 18, 2022 at 9:22 AM Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Mar 2022 10:13:12 +0800
> David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> > Does either (or both) of these features sound useful, and is this
> > sort-of API the right model? (Personally, I think there's a reasonable
> > scope for both.) Is anything obviously missing or wrong? Do the names,
> > descriptions etc. make any sense?
>
> Obviously I'm biased toward the ftrace solution ;-)
Personally, I like providing both - as long as we can keep the
interface the same.
Ftrace is less visually invasive, but it is also less flexible in
capabilities, and requires substantial work to support on new
architectures.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-04 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-03-18 2:13 [RFC PATCH 0/2] kunit: Support redirecting function calls David Gow
2022-03-18 2:13 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] kunit: Expose 'static stub' API to redirect functions David Gow
2022-04-04 20:16 ` Brendan Higgins
2022-04-15 22:05 ` Steve Muckle
2022-05-04 20:35 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-05-04 20:42 ` Brendan Higgins
2022-05-04 21:16 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-03-18 2:13 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] kunit: expose ftrace-based API for stubbing out functions during tests David Gow
2022-04-04 20:17 ` Brendan Higgins
2022-04-04 21:13 ` Daniel Latypov
2022-03-18 13:21 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] kunit: Support redirecting function calls Steven Rostedt
2022-04-04 20:13 ` Brendan Higgins [this message]
2022-04-15 21:43 ` Steve Muckle
2022-04-15 21:44 ` Steve Muckle
2022-04-04 20:14 ` Brendan Higgins
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAFd5g461Poh37o=3m6EXppdX7oS0D5vZxvFAEtzJMwtBD1VJEw@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=brendanhiggins@google.com \
--cc=davidgow@google.com \
--cc=dlatypov@google.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kunit-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=smuckle@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).