linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>
Cc: Kent Gibson <warthog618@gmail.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/6] gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in struct gpio_chip
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2021 18:14:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YaZNyMV5gX5cZpar@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211130154127.12272-3-brgl@bgdev.pl>

On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 04:41:23PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Software nodes allow us to represent hierarchies for device components
> that don't have their struct device representation yet - for instance:
> banks of GPIOs under a common GPIO expander. The core gpiolib core

core .. core ?!

> however doesn't offer any way of passing this information from the
> drivers.
> 
> This extends struct gpio_chip with a pointer to fwnode that can be set
> by the driver and used to pass device properties for child nodes.
> 
> This is similar to how we handle device-tree sub-nodes with
> CONFIG_OF_GPIO enabled.

Not sure I understand the proposal. Can you provide couple of (simplest)
examples?

And also it sounds like reinventing a wheel. What problem do you have that you
need to solve this way?

...

> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO)
> +	if (gc->of_node && gc->fwnode) {
> +		pr_err("%s: tried to set both the of_node and fwnode in gpio_chip\n",
> +		       __func__);
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	}
> +#endif /* CONFIG_OF_GPIO */

I don't like this. It seems like a hack right now.

Is it possible to convert all GPIO controller drivers to provide an fwnode
rather than doing this? (I believe in most of the drivers we can drop
completely the of_node assignment).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-30 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-30 15:41 [PATCH v11 0/6] gpio-sim: configfs-based GPIO simulator Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-11-30 15:41 ` [PATCH v11 1/6] gpiolib: provide gpiod_remove_hogs() Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-11-30 15:41 ` [PATCH v11 2/6] gpiolib: allow to specify the firmware node in struct gpio_chip Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-11-30 16:14   ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2021-11-30 16:19     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-30 16:55       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-30 18:32       ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-11-30 20:31         ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-30 20:25     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-11-30 20:59       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-30 21:04         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-01 13:11           ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-01 13:39             ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-01 13:53               ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-01 14:28                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-01 14:33                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-01 14:36                     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-01 14:54                       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 10:57             ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 11:24               ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-02 11:35                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 11:37                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 13:06                     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-02 13:44                       ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 13:52                         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-02 15:40                           ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-12-02 17:00                             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-12-02 17:29                               ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-11-30 15:41 ` [PATCH v11 3/6] gpio: sim: new testing module Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-11-30 15:41 ` [PATCH v11 4/6] selftests: gpio: provide a helper for reading chip info Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-11-30 15:41 ` [PATCH v11 5/6] selftests: gpio: add a helper for reading GPIO line names Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-11-30 15:41 ` [PATCH v11 6/6] selftests: gpio: add test cases for gpio-sim Bartosz Golaszewski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YaZNyMV5gX5cZpar@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).