* [linux-lvm] Patch request 2.3.43
@ 2000-02-11 1:11 James Pattinson
2000-02-11 15:20 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: James Pattinson @ 2000-02-11 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-lvm
[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 668 bytes --]
Hi -
Just tried applying patch-2.3.40-LVM-0.8i to 2.3.43 and it don't work:
[root@greebo][linux]# patch -p1 -s --dry-run < /root/patch-2.3.40-LVM-0.8i
2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to
Documentation/Configure.help.rej
4 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to
drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c.rej
[root@greebo][linux]#
Ok so I don't care /too/ much about Configure.help but I guess ll_rw_blk.c
is kind of important! *g*
I had a look@the reject file (attached, if anyone cares) and it looks
like some of it could be redundant stuff anyway. However given the amount
of changes between 2.3.40 and 2.3.43 perhaps a new merge needs to be done!
Cheers!
James
[-- Attachment #2: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 3906 bytes --]
***************
*** 582,587 ****
/* MD and loop can't handle plugging without deadlocking */
if (major != MD_MAJOR && major != LOOP_MAJOR &&
major != DDV_MAJOR && major != NBD_MAJOR
&& q->use_plug)
plug_device(q); /* is atomic */
} else switch (major) {
--- 596,602 ----
/* MD and loop can't handle plugging without deadlocking */
if (major != MD_MAJOR && major != LOOP_MAJOR &&
major != DDV_MAJOR && major != NBD_MAJOR
+ && major != LVM_BLK_MAJOR
&& q->use_plug)
plug_device(q); /* is atomic */
} else switch (major) {
***************
*** 770,781 ****
goto sorry;
}
- /* Md remaps blocks now */
bh[i]->b_rdev = bh[i]->b_dev;
bh[i]->b_rsector=bh[i]->b_blocknr*(bh[i]->b_size >> 9);
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD
if (major==MD_MAJOR &&
- md_map (MINOR(bh[i]->b_dev), &bh[i]->b_rdev,
&bh[i]->b_rsector, bh[i]->b_size >> 9)) {
printk (KERN_ERR
"Bad md_map in ll_rw_block\n");
--- 786,819 ----
goto sorry;
}
+ /* LVM and MD remap blocks now */
bh[i]->b_rdev = bh[i]->b_dev;
bh[i]->b_rsector=bh[i]->b_blocknr*(bh[i]->b_size >> 9);
+ #if defined CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LVM || defined CONFIG_BLK_DEV_LVM_MODULE
+ major = MAJOR(bh[i]->b_dev);
+ if ( major == LVM_BLK_MAJOR) {
+ if ( lvm_map_ptr == NULL) {
+ printk ( KERN_ERR
+ "Bad lvm_map_ptr in ll_rw_block\n");
+ goto sorry;
+ }
+ if ( ( lvm_map_ptr) ( MINOR ( bh[i]->b_dev),
+ &bh[i]->b_rdev,
+ &bh[i]->b_rsector,
+ bh[i]->b_size >> 9,
+ rw) != 0) {
+ printk ( KERN_ERR
+ "Bad lvm_map in ll_rw_block\n");
+ goto sorry;
+ }
+ /* remap major too ... */
+ major = MAJOR(bh[i]->b_rdev);
+ }
+ #endif
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD
if (major==MD_MAJOR &&
+ /* changed v to allow LVM to remap */
+ md_map (MINOR(bh[i]->b_rdev), &bh[i]->b_rdev,
&bh[i]->b_rsector, bh[i]->b_size >> 9)) {
printk (KERN_ERR
"Bad md_map in ll_rw_block\n");
***************
*** 793,803 ****
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
set_bit(BH_Req, &bh[i]->b_state);
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD
- if (MAJOR(bh[i]->b_dev) == MD_MAJOR) {
- md_make_request(MINOR (bh[i]->b_dev), rw, bh[i]);
continue;
}
#endif
__make_request(q, MAJOR(bh[i]->b_rdev), rw, bh[i]);
}
--- 831,851 ----
for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
set_bit(BH_Req, &bh[i]->b_state);
#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_MD
+ if (MAJOR(bh[i]->b_rdev) == MD_MAJOR) {
+ /* remap device for MD too v */
+ md_make_request(MINOR (bh[i]->b_rdev), rw, bh[i]);
continue;
}
#endif
+ /* get correct device request queue after
+ LVM and/or MD have remapped this buffer */
+ if (!(q = get_queue(bh[i]->b_rdev))) {
+ printk(KERN_ERR
+ "ll_rw_block: Trying to access nonexistent "
+ "block-device %s (%ld)\n",
+ kdevname(bh[0]->b_rdev), bh[0]->b_rsector>>1);
+ goto sorry;
+ }
__make_request(q, MAJOR(bh[i]->b_rdev), rw, bh[i]);
}
***************
*** 818,826 ****
return;
}
- #ifdef CONFIG_STRAM_SWAP
- extern int stram_device_init( void );
- #endif
/*
* First step of what used to be end_request
--- 866,871 ----
return;
}
/*
* First step of what used to be end_request
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [linux-lvm] Patch request 2.3.43
2000-02-11 1:11 [linux-lvm] Patch request 2.3.43 James Pattinson
@ 2000-02-11 15:20 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Heinz Mauelshagen @ 2000-02-11 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: James Pattinson; +Cc: mge, linux-lvm
> Hi -
>
> Just tried applying patch-2.3.40-LVM-0.8i to 2.3.43 and it don't work:
>
> [root@greebo][linux]# patch -p1 -s --dry-run < /root/patch-2.3.40-LVM-0.8i
> 2 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to
> Documentation/Configure.help.rej
> 4 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to
> drivers/block/ll_rw_blk.c.rej
> [root@greebo][linux]#
>
> Ok so I don't care /too/ much about Configure.help but I guess ll_rw_blk.c
> is kind of important! *g*
>
> I had a look at the reject file (attached, if anyone cares) and it looks
> like some of it could be redundant stuff anyway. However given the amount
> of changes between 2.3.40 and 2.3.43 perhaps a new merge needs to be done!
Yes, give me a chance at the weekend ;-{)
Heinz
>
> Cheers!
>
> James
Content-Description:
[Attachment, skipping...]
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Systemmanagement CS-TS T-Nova
Entwicklungszentrum Darmstadt
Heinz Mauelshagen Otto-Roehm-Strasse 71c
Senior Systems Engineer Postfach 10 05 41
64205 Darmstadt
mge@EZ-Darmstadt.Telekom.de Germany
+49 6151 886-425
FAX-386
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-02-11 15:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-11 1:11 [linux-lvm] Patch request 2.3.43 James Pattinson
2000-02-11 15:20 ` Heinz Mauelshagen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).