archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Ren <>
To: David Teigland <>
Cc: LVM general discussion and development <>
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] lvmlockd: about the limitation on lvresizing the LV active on multiple nodes
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 16:09:08 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Hi David,

I see the comments on res_process():

  * Go through queued actions, and make lock/unlock calls on the resource
  * based on the actions and the existing lock state.
  * All lock operations sent to the lock manager are non-blocking.
  * This is because sanlock does not support lock queueing.
  * Eventually we could enhance this to take advantage of lock
  * queueing when available (i.e. for the dlm).

Is it the reason why lvmlockd has limitation on lvresize with "sh" lock
because lvmlockd cannot up convert "sh" to "ex" to perform lvresize command?


On 12/28/2017 06:42 PM, Eric Ren wrote:
> Hi David,
> I see there is a limitation on lvesizing the LV active on multiple node.
>> From `man lvmlockd`:
> """
> limitations of lockd VGs
> ...
> * resizing an LV that is active in the shared mode on multiple hosts
> """
> It seems a big limitation to use lvmlockd in cluster:
> """
> c1-n1:~ # lvresize -L-1G vg1/lv1
>   WARNING: Reducing active logical volume to 1.00 GiB.
>   THIS MAY DESTROY YOUR DATA (filesystem etc.)
> Do you really want to reduce vg1/lv1? [y/n]: y
>   LV is already locked with incompatible mode: vg1/lv1
> """
> Node "c1-n1" is the last node having vg1/lv1 active on it.
> Can we change the lock mode from "shared" to "exclusive" to
> lvresize without having to deactivate the LV on the last node?
> It will reduce the availability if we have to deactivate LV on all
> nodes to resize. Is there plan to eliminate this limitation in the
> near future?
> Regards,
> Eric
> _______________________________________________
> linux-lvm mailing list
> read the LVM HOW-TO at

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-02  8:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-28 10:42 [linux-lvm] lvmlockd: about the limitation on lvresizing the LV active on multiple nodes Eric Ren
2018-01-02  8:09 ` Eric Ren [this message]
2018-01-02 17:10 ` David Teigland
2018-01-03  3:52   ` Eric Ren
2018-01-03 15:07     ` David Teigland
2018-01-04  9:06       ` Eric Ren
2018-01-09  2:42         ` Eric Ren
2018-01-09 15:42           ` David Teigland
2018-01-10  6:55             ` Eric Ren
2018-01-10 15:56               ` David Teigland
2018-01-11  9:32                 ` Eric Ren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).