linux-lvm.redhat.com archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Drew Smith <drew@winterland.mainland.ab.ca>
To: "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>, linux-lvm@msede.com
Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] LVM, raw-io, devfs
Date: Fri, 01 Oct 1999 12:39:09 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <37F4FFCD.6AE2EC3E@mainland.ab.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 14324.58266.920834.895229@dukat.scot.redhat.com


	Hi, just checking a fact. :)

	IBM's ADSM(*) (well, TSM now, thanks to Tivoli) uses raw logical
volumes on a fairly native level as storage pools, etc.  I'm curious,
having never looked into raw IO under Linux, whether it's the same
principles - and, that said, whether or not IBM will be porting the TSM
server to Linux?  

	Regardless, LVM is a huge jump in the right direction if we want IBM to
release more schtuff for Linux.  

	Now, I've just got to find a Linux-HSM(**) project to control my
optical jukebox. :)  Any ideas whether this exists?

(apologies for the footnotes, they're there for the benefit of people on
the list who don't know these acronyms)
*: ADSM: ADSTAR Distributed Storage Management.  A highly-cool
enterprise backup system, scheduling, etc - IBM's version of Veritas.
**: HSM: Heirarchial Storage Management.  Basically, take a tape library
or jukebox, make a database of everything on every cartridge, and mount
that database as a filesystem.  Copy something out of it, the library
goes and gets the appropriate media and feeds it to the drive.  With a
20-cart optical jukebox, this is basically a 20*1.3G filesystem (albiet
a fairly slow one, but with a script to copy the file into a temp space,
perfect as a low-use fileserver.  ADSM does this, but the cost is hefty,
to say the least.)

	Cheers,
	- Drew.
:wq

"Stephen C. Tweedie" wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Thu, 30 Sep 1999 23:48:23 -0300, "Fernando Dammous"
> <ferdam@internetcom.com.br> said:
> 
> > Now, I would like to install the devfs and mainly the raw-io.
> 
> > Can I install them in a kernel 2.0.36, which is already patched with
> > LVM?
> 
> I've never tried the raw IO code on 2.0: let me know how it goes!  In
> principle, there is no reason why raw IO on LVM should not work.
> 
> --Stephen

  reply	other threads:[~1999-10-01 18:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-10-01  2:48 [linux-lvm] LVM, raw-io, devfs Fernando Dammous
1999-10-01 12:40 ` Adrien Farkas
1999-10-01 16:38 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-01 18:39   ` Drew Smith [this message]
1999-10-01 19:15     ` Luca Berra
1999-10-02 15:01     ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-02 15:53       ` Eric Smith
1999-10-03  7:43     ` Harald Milz
1999-10-02 17:08   ` Fernando Dammous
1999-10-03  5:56     ` pamvdam
1999-10-04 10:43       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-04 11:03         ` pamvdam
1999-10-03 10:14     ` Adrien Farkas
1999-10-03 17:23       ` Fernando Dammous
1999-10-04  9:28         ` Adrien Farkas
1999-10-04 10:44       ` Stephen C. Tweedie
1999-10-03 13:06 Daniel Whicker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=37F4FFCD.6AE2EC3E@mainland.ab.ca \
    --to=drew@winterland.mainland.ab.ca \
    --cc=linux-lvm@msede.com \
    --cc=sct@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).